Why didn't Parker play?
Eh, Parker was not the difference in this series. He brought nothing in this game.
Eh, Parker was not the difference in this series. He brought nothing in this game.
Because he had a sprained ankle. He's a six time All Star, winning without that on the court is impressive.
Game 1 14/12
Game 2 22/5
Game 3 9/4
Game 4 14/4
Game 5 12/4
Game 6 8/0
Youre nuts. Games 4-6 mean nothing because of his injured ankle. He played very well in games 1 and 2. Terribly in 3 and the Spurs lost. I am a big Patty Mills fan and think he needs to play more, but to act like Parker means nothing is a bit much.
Not saying he's nothing, when he's 'on' he can be unstoppable, the problem is teams have been able to design defenses to stop him in long series. If you had to pick a PG to win you game 7 of the NBA finals is he in your top 5? 10 and 4 last year FWIW.
If you had to rate the Thunder's chances in San Antonio without Ibaka versus the Spurs' chances in OKC without Parker (even for just a half), you'd take the Thunder every time. That's the one big takeaway I had from Game 6 the other night.
He has to be almost in perfect health from te waist down to keep playing like that.