wake20
Well-known member
Generally agree as one of the key reasons to trade Escobar is that they wanted to get more left-handed as the Nats' lineup is dominated by right-handed bats (and Escobar makes about half of what Phillps does). That said, Escobar's defense has regressed to the point where he was a huge liability in the field. Phillips is not as strong defensively as he was a few years ago, but he would still be a big defensive upgrade over Escobar. Would think that the Nats only make the trade if the Reds eat some of the $27 million owed Phillips over the next two years, or if the Reds agree to take Papelbon and the $11 million owed to him next year.
I think trading Escobar after his solid year was probably the right move, although I don't know much about Trevor Gott (they certainly needed bullpen help, though). This allowed Rendon to move back to 3B.
Adding Phillips is kind of an "eh" move since I'm guessing the Reds eat some money and the prospects going back to the Reds would be middle tier guys. I don't really understand adding a low OBP, RH bat though. I'm going to assume they don't want to lose a year of control with Turner and start him opening day, and Daniel Murphy was going to cost too much.
I really don't like their lineup now, though. One true LH bat and then Espinosa (.232/.300/.409 as LH). Looking at starting five guys with below average/poor OBP and a manager who doesn't particularly value OBP.