• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

So has anyone changed their thinking on Gitmo

GaDeac

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
453
Reaction score
50
We have learned in the last 24 hours that the tracking of Bin Laden began with information garnered in Guantanamo Bay four years ago. So it begs the question:

Has this event made anyone that was against what was going on at Guantanamo change their opinions? Does it in some way justify what we were doing down there?
 
Now it's four years ago? Go said it was in 2004.
 
It doesn't track that just because we got this info while operating an illegal black ops prison -- one that betrays core American values and serves as a rallying point for our enemies -- that we wouldn't have also gotten the same info by using legal investigative methods. It's highly likely that the same intel would've been obtained had we obeyed our laws and stuck to proven, workable forensic techniques.

GITMO is a stain on the American character. It's closure is a moral imperative. The United States shouldn't be in the wildly hypocritical business of throwing people in a hole indefinitely without providing any charges, process, evidence rights, or a day in court. That was true yesterday and remains true today.
 
Last edited:
^^^
pos rep if I had 50 post

Arlington not skins
 
Last edited:
GITMO has never been the Great Satan that people claim it to be. Keep in mind those who have made those claims-- terrorists, their dirtbag lawyers, and people with political axes to grind. Even Obama, once he took office, realized that GITMO not only serves a purpose, but is pretty damn well run, especially once it got all the kinks worked out after its first year of operation.

OBL's driver hated GITMO so much he made it a point in his plea deal to make sure he served his time in GITMO and not in a federal pen. The inmates have it so bad there, that there's an obesity epidimic. They get badassed healthcare and medical checkups, even though they have savagely attacked their doctors at times.

People can argue about enhanced interrogation methods on 3 deserving assholes all they want, but that is, IMO, separate and distinct from the purpose that GITMO serves and serves well.
 
It doesn't track that just because we got this info while operating an illegal black ops prison -- one that betrays core American values and serves as a rallying point for our enemies -- that we wouldn't have also gotten the same info by using legal investigative methods. It's highly likely that the same intel would've been obtained had we obeyed our laws and stuck to proven, workable forensic techniques.

GITMO is a stain on the American character. It's closure is a moral imperative. The Untied States shouldn't be in the wildly hypocritical business of throwing people in a hole indefinitely without providing any charges, process, evidence rights, or a day in court. That was true yesterday and remains true today.

Bin Laden was not given due process and he never got his day in court; he got a bullet in the head. Why don't you argue his case as well?
 
GITMO is still on life support because the use of illegal torture techniques on the Yemeni prisoners (and others) has created a class of prisoners that are known to be guilty, but can never be tried in any court because the evidence of their guilt was obtained illegally and is now inadmissible (even in a military tribunal). The cowardly shortcut of "enhanced interrogation techniques" serves only to prevent bringing these known terrorists to justice.

So Obama has a shit sandwich- he can't try them because of what Bush and Cheney approved, but he knows without a doubt they are guilty of crimes and a threat to our security. So he compromised a core belief in the name of national security.

But make no mistake, GITMO is not taking new prisoners, and as soon as we can find an answer to this company of ghost men that we are stuck with, the facility with be closed, and only remembered as part of a dark epoch in our history of ignoring the rule of law.

We've stopped the torture, so this class of prisoner will soon be relegated to history. We can then reaffirm that everyone has the right to basic legal process, even our enemies. We're on the right path, albeit to slowly.
 
Last edited:
We also don't know if we got the information prior to KSM being tortured. One of his interrogators has spoken to the press on multiple occasions stating the actionable intel they got from KSM was prior to being waterboarded and other forms of torture.
 
Bin Laden was not given due process and he never got his day in court; he got a bullet in the head. Why don't you argue his case as well?

He was a legally-indicted fugitive sought in connection with numerous crimes for which we had ample evidence to convict. He was killed while resisting capture. Done.
 
He was a legally-indicted fugitive sought in connection with numerous crimes for which we had ample evidence to convict. He was killed while resisting capture. Done.

It's been reported that the the intent of the operation was to kill Bin Laden, is that not true?
 
My apologies RJ. I believe you are correct in that it was 2004.
 
It's been reported that the the intent of the operation was to kill Bin Laden, is that not true?

I'm guessing if you looked on any paperwork for that operation, the intent would be capture by any means necessary. Or whatever term they use.
 
My apologies RJ. I believe you are correct in that it was 2004.

Michael Isikoff is reporting that the reason we didn't find this guy until now is that KSM only gave one of his aliases and never his real name.

We couldn't find him sooner because the intle gotten was very incomplete.

The guy had been doing this job since then.
 
I'm pretty sure that if I had to go to a jail, I would choose GITMO....I have seen OZ!
 
This was truly an American leadership team effort, again the story is that the CIA truly does work.

Phone call by Kuwaiti courier led to bin Laden

By MATT APUZZO
The Associated Press

6:59 a.m. Tuesday, May 3, 2011
WASHINGTON — When one of Osama bin Laden's most trusted aides picked up the phone last year, he unknowingly led U.S. pursuers to the doorstep of his boss, the world's most wanted terrorist.

That monitored phone call, recounted Monday by a U.S. official, ended a years-long search for bin Laden's personal courier, the key break in a worldwide manhunt. The courier, in turn, led U.S. intelligence to a walled compound in northeast Pakistan, where a team of Navy SEALs shot bin Laden to death.

The violent final minutes were the culmination of years of intelligence work. Inside the CIA team hunting bin Laden, it always was clear that bin Laden's vulnerability was his couriers. He was too smart to let al-Qaida foot soldiers, or even his senior commanders, know his hideout. But if he wanted to get his messages out, somebody had to carry them, someone bin Laden trusted with his life.

Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, detainees in the CIA's secret prison network told interrogators about an important courier with the nom de guerre Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti who was close to bin Laden. After the CIA captured al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he confirmed knowing al-Kuwaiti but denied he had anything to do with al-Qaida.

Then in 2004, top al-Qaida operative Hassan Ghul was captured in Iraq. Ghul told the CIA that al-Kuwaiti was a courier, someone crucial to the terrorist organization. In particular, Ghul said, the courier was close to Faraj al-Libi, who replaced Mohammed as al-Qaida's operational commander. It was a key break in the hunt for in bin Laden's personal courier.

"Hassan Ghul was the linchpin," a U.S. official said.

Finally, in May 2005, al-Libi was captured. Under CIA interrogation, al-Libi admitted that when he was promoted to succeed Mohammed, he received the word through a courier. But he made up a name for the courier and denied knowing al-Kuwaiti, a denial that was so adamant and unbelievable that the CIA took it as confirmation that he and Mohammed were protecting the courier. It only reinforced the idea that al-Kuwaiti was very important to al-Qaida.

If they could find the man known as al-Kuwaiti, they'd find bin Laden.

The revelation that intelligence gleaned from the CIA's so-called black sites helped kill bin Laden was seen as vindication for many intelligence officials who have been repeatedly investigated and criticized for their involvement in a program that involved the harshest interrogation methods in U.S. history.

"We got beat up for it, but those efforts led to this great day," said Marty Martin, a retired CIA officer who for years led the hunt for bin Laden.

Mohammed did not discuss al-Kuwaiti while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former officials said. He acknowledged knowing him many months later under standard interrogation, they said, leaving it once again up for debate as to whether the harsh technique was a valuable tool or an unnecessarily violent tactic.

It took years of work before the CIA identified the courier's real name: Sheikh Abu Ahmed, a Pakistani man born in Kuwait. When they did identify him, he was nowhere to be found. The CIA's sources didn't know where he was hiding. Bin Laden was famously insistent that no phones or computers be used near him, so the eavesdroppers at the National Security Agency kept coming up cold.

Ahmed was identified by detainees as a mid-level operative who helped al-Qaida members and their families find safe havens. But his whereabouts were such a mystery to U.S. intelligence that, according to Guantanamo Bay documents, one detainee said Ahmed was wounded while fleeing U.S. forces during the invasion of Afghanistan and later died in the arms of the detainee.

But in the middle of last year, Ahmed had a telephone conversation with someone being monitored by U.S. intelligence, according to an American official, who like others interviewed for this story spoke only on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive operation. Ahmed was located somewhere away from bin Laden's hideout when he had the discussion, but it was enough to help intelligence officials locate and watch Ahmed.

In August 2010, Ahmed unknowingly led authorities to a compound in the northeast Pakistani town of Abbottabad, where al-Libi had once lived. The walls surrounding the property were as high as 18 feet and topped with barbed wire. Intelligence officials had known about the house for years, but they always suspected that bin Laden would be surrounded by heavily armed security guards. Nobody patrolled the compound in Abbottabad.

In fact, nobody came or went. And no telephone or Internet lines ran from the compound. The CIA soon believed that bin Laden was hiding in plain sight, in a hideout especially built to go unnoticed. But since bin Laden never traveled and nobody could get onto the compound without passing through two security gates, there was no way to be sure.

Despite that uncertainty, intelligence officials realized this could represent the best chance ever to get to bin Laden. They decided not to share the information with anyone, including staunch counterterrorism allies such as Britain, Canada and Australia.

By mid-February, the officials were convinced a "high-value target" was hiding in the compound. President Barack Obama wanted to take action.

"They were confident and their confidence was growing: 'This is different. This intelligence case is different. What we see in this compound is different than anything we've ever seen before,'" John Brennan, the president's top counterterrorism adviser, said Monday. "I was confident that we had the basis to take action."

Options were limited. The compound was in a residential neighborhood in a sovereign country. If Obama ordered an airstrike and bin Laden was not in the compound, it would be a huge diplomatic problem. Even if Obama was right, obliterating the compound might make it nearly impossible to confirm bin Laden's death.

Said Brennan: "The president had to evaluate the strength of that information, and then made what I believe was one of the most gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory."

Obama tapped two dozen members of the Navy's elite SEAL Team Six to carry out a raid with surgical accuracy.

Before dawn Monday morning, a pair of helicopters left Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan. The choppers entered Pakistani airspace using sophisticated technology intended to evade that country's radar systems, a U.S. official said.

Officially, it was a kill-or-capture mission, since the U.S. doesn't kill unarmed people trying to surrender. But it was clear from the beginning that whoever was behind those walls had no intention of surrendering, two U.S. officials said.

The helicopters lowered into the compound, dropping the SEALs behind the walls. No shots were fired, but shortly after the team hit the ground, one of the helicopters came crashing down and rolled onto its side for reasons the government has yet to explain. None of the SEALs was injured, however, and the mission continued uninterrupted.

With the CIA and White House monitoring the situation in real time — presumably by live satellite feed or video carried by the SEALs — the team stormed the compound.

Thanks to sophisticated satellite monitoring, U.S. forces knew they'd likely find bin Laden's family on the second and third floors of one of the buildings on the property, officials said. The SEALs secured the rest of the property first, then proceeded to the room where bin Laden was hiding. A firefight ensued, Brennan said.

Ahmed and his brother were killed, officials said. Then, the SEALs killed bin Laden with a bullet just above his left eye, blowing off part his skull, another official said. Using the call sign for his visual identification, one of the soldiers communicated that "Geronimo" had been killed in action, according to a U.S. official.

Bin Laden's body was immediately identifiable, but the U.S. also conducted DNA testing that identified him with near 100 percent certainty, senior administration officials said. Photo analysis by the CIA, confirmation on site by a woman believed to be bin Laden's wife, who was wounded, and matching physical features such as bin Laden's height all helped confirm the identification. At the White House, there was no doubt.

"I think the accomplishment that very brave personnel from the United States government were able to realize yesterday is a defining moment in the war against al-Qaida, the war on terrorism, by decapitating the head of the snake known as al-Qaida," Brennan said.

U.S. forces searched the compound and flew away with documents, hard drives and DVDs that could provide valuable intelligence about al-Qaida, a U.S. official said. The entire operation took about 40 minutes, officials said.

Bin Laden's body was flown to the USS Carl Vinson in the North Arabian sea, a senior defense official said. There, aboard a U.S. warship, officials conducted a traditional Islamic burial ritual. Bin Laden's body was washed and placed in a white sheet. He was placed in a weighted bag that, after religious remarks by a military officer, was slipped into the sea about 2 a.m. EDT Monday.

Said the president: "I think we can all agree this is a good day for America."
 
Back
Top