PDA

View Full Version : Banned: RJKarl



IrishSlim
06-15-2014, 06:30 PM
For 3 days, for suggesting DeacMan should off himself on the "2 Questions about Soccer" Thread.

pinochadeac
06-15-2014, 07:05 PM
Is that really that bad?

bmoneydeac
06-15-2014, 07:28 PM
Weak imo

VaDeac
06-15-2014, 11:35 PM
As if the guy's persecution complex needed further stoking...

CheesePritchard
06-16-2014, 06:57 AM
For 3 days, for suggesting DeacMan should off himself on the "2 Questions about Soccer" Thread.
"Two Soccer Questions"

TownieDeac
06-16-2014, 09:09 AM
Lol absurd. You're gonna have to ban a lot of taggers and posters.

ETA:

http://www.ogboards.com/forums/tags.php?tag=just+kill+yourself
http://www.ogboards.com/forums/search.php?searchid=228506

Wakeforest22890
06-16-2014, 10:38 AM
Silly, primarily because this sets ridiculous precedent.

bmoneydeac
06-16-2014, 10:39 AM
Can I tell someone to DIAF?

ThinkingWithMyDeac
06-16-2014, 10:44 AM
Meh, but that thread was trolling and being a douche so should have just banned for that.

Wakeforest22890
06-16-2014, 10:45 AM
Can I tell someone to DIAF?

I got banned on the other boards for saying that to someone. Might have been the Fish That Saved Pittsburgh.

That thread wasn't really trolling, it was just him being ignorant.

Furthermore, if that rule were actually being followed then Lectro would have been permabanned.

bym051d
06-16-2014, 10:57 AM
Lol absurd. You're gonna have to ban a lot of taggers and posters.

Truth. What's the difference in posting horrible things and tagging them?

I'm pretty certain it was not a serious wish that DeacMan kill himself.

TownieDeac
06-16-2014, 01:09 PM
Mods should just call it what it is, and at least recognize this is about rj constantly being a burden, that this was the straw that broke the camel's back.

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 02:35 PM
Can I tell someone to DIAF?

I think I told bdz to die in a fire when the Masiello degree news broke. #noragrets


Mods should just call it what it is, and at least recognize this is about rj constantly being a burden, that this was the straw that broke the camel's back.

If that's the case, though, ban him. Just fucking ban him. What does three days do, other than give him more reason to whine and stir up more shit?

marquee moon
06-16-2014, 03:07 PM
As far as I can tell, he is not even posting over at Scout. Should we be concerned?

bigdoublezero
06-16-2014, 03:12 PM
I think I told bdz to die in a fire when the Masiello degree news broke. #noragrets

THIS AGGRESSION WILL NOT STAND

OldGoldBeard
06-16-2014, 03:15 PM
The dozens or hundreds of threats to kill me or wish me or my family dead are OK.

The year of stalking me is OK.

A mod using his position to put Nazi propoganda as my avatar is OK.

I apologized and gave my word that nothing would happen. This is diametrically opposite to those who promise to continue and wish me death.

Also in the interim since it happened, Slim and I have even made peace. Other fulfilling phna's request for retaliation, I have received many negs without retaliating to any of the usual suspects.

I have proven for that week that I have changed. To do this now, without any warning, after an apology and proof it won't happen is as wrong as my actions and the actions of the mod who put all of this into motion.

Of that person is not going to be held responsible.


#justiceforrj

marquee moon
06-16-2014, 03:21 PM
#justiceforrj

is this recent?

RacerDeac
06-16-2014, 03:35 PM
is this recent?

Click the little linky arrow next to his name...

http://www.ogboards.com/forums/showthread.php/16019-Want-to-Know-Your-Rep-Stats-Ask-your-friendly-Mods!?p=1149515#post1149515

marquee moon
06-16-2014, 03:40 PM
Click the little linky arrow next to his name...

http://www.ogboards.com/forums/showthread.php/16019-Want-to-Know-Your-Rep-Stats-Ask-your-friendly-Mods!?p=1149515#post1149515

He's watching us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ayo
06-16-2014, 03:51 PM
RJ is gonna go apeshit about this when he gets back.

IrishSlim
06-16-2014, 04:05 PM
For what it's worth, this vote was unanimous, and mod votes are almost never unanimous.

Personally, I tried not to consider RJ's past history of being involved in 86% of board dust-ups, but am willing to admit that there's no doubt that subconsciously it was there. He's always involved in issues. That's just a fact, Jacks.

And if he thinks coming back and bitching after three days is the right move, he should reconsider his options.

TownieDeac
06-16-2014, 04:15 PM
For what it's worth, this vote was unanimous, and mod votes are almost never unanimous.

Personally, I tried not to consider RJ's past history of being involved in 86% of board dust-ups, but am willing to admit that there's no doubt that subconsciously it was there. He's always involved in issues. That's just a fact, Jacks.

And if he thinks coming back and bitching after three days is the right move, he should reconsider his options.

so i genuinely don't give a shit about rj getting banned, and think it'll be nice to have him gone for a few days, but is this a hard and fast rule now? see my links above to the dozens and dozens of times it has happened previously on the boards.

Kent
06-16-2014, 04:25 PM
Granted, I'm not a Mod and don't see the inner workings of all of this, but we should remember two things. One, there are a lot of people on the boards who are obsessed with RJ and constantly abuse him. Two and more importantly, this is a WFU sports message board. If all we talk about is WFU sports, it would be boring and depressing. RJ spats, while undoubtedly a pain for Mods, are often great fun to read.

IrishSlim
06-16-2014, 04:26 PM
First reply is Townie? LK just made $40 in the mod pool.

I feel like we've had this same argument about subjective calls in the past. Again, certain decisions will have to be subjective. That's the way it's been, is, and will continue to be. We take into account things like: tone and thread trajectory. I personally took into account the fact that RJ never directly apologized to DeacMan (though kept claiming he'd apologized), and the fact that he didn't feel compelled to edit the post in question. His misleading revisionism offended my sensibilities and concern for exactitude.

DeaconCav06
06-16-2014, 04:28 PM
I think the question is what would RJ have wanted done if Deacman told RJ to kill himself.

I think he would have wanted him banned.

RacerDeac
06-16-2014, 04:29 PM
see my links above to the dozens and dozens of times it has happened previously on the boards.

Technically, 22 tags is not dozens and dozens. And the phrase "just kill yourself" only occurs 9 times on the board, at least once quoting and laughing at the tag and another time on this thread. BAN THEM ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

deacvision7
06-16-2014, 04:30 PM
Mods should have stripped rjkarl of all his precious internet reputation points. That would have been much harder for him to take.

TownieDeac
06-16-2014, 04:31 PM
like i said, i don't blame y'all for banning him, i wouldn't wanna have to deal with his shit all the time, just curious why it applies now for the first time ever

RacerDeac
06-16-2014, 04:32 PM
like i said, i don't blame y'all for banning him, i wouldn't wanna have to deal with his shit all the time, just curious why it applies now for the first time ever

About as unfair as a penalty kick if you ask me.

IrishSlim
06-16-2014, 04:32 PM
Because fair or not, he's just run out of advocates by wearing us all down. We determined it was a bannable offense and banned him. Have we let other bannable offenses go in the past, when we shouldn't have? Probably. Some of those instances have been previous RJ flareups. Maybe we should've banned him (and/or others) then, and this would've been avoided. Who knows. Best we can hope for is that this impacts the future for the better. Or something.

TownieDeac
06-16-2014, 04:34 PM
Technically, 22 tags is not dozens and dozens. And the phrase "just kill yourself" only occurs 9 times on the board, at least once quoting and laughing at the tag and another time on this thread.

22+9...idk i'm an english guy

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/There-Are-Dozens-of-Us-Tobias-Funke-Arrested-Development.gif

ChrisL68
06-16-2014, 04:38 PM
Three days of RJ stewing about this?

Please notify the board when he is reinstated and get the popcorn ready.

bym051d
06-16-2014, 04:45 PM
Can banned users read the message boards?

CheesePritchard
06-16-2014, 04:59 PM
I was trying to think of some of the permabans throughout Wake Sports message board history. Can anyone help me out? I have been part of the community for 11 years now and can only think of my BOY wakefan87.

BiffTannen
06-16-2014, 05:43 PM
So the guy with the board's biggest crucifixion complex will return after three days? Interesting.

ThinkingWithMyDeac
06-16-2014, 05:59 PM
There are probably 10 to 20 of us permabanned on the other board.

bym051d
06-16-2014, 06:10 PM
So the guy with the board's biggest crucifixion complex will return after three days? Interesting.

And is a Jew.

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 06:27 PM
And is a Jew.

BRINGING REAL LIFE ONTO THE BOARS IS A BANNABLE OFFENSE!!!!!!!!!

PhDeac
06-16-2014, 07:00 PM
BRINGING REAL LIFE ONTO THE BOARS IS A BANNABLE OFFENSE!!!!!!!!!

Allegedly.

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 07:01 PM
Allegedly.

Are you saying that single ph really did like escorts?

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 07:02 PM
Who started the ph is black tag? Are they banned now?

PhDeac
06-16-2014, 07:07 PM
Are you saying that single ph really did like escorts?

NO PERMISSION!

But seriously, the mods need to be consistent.

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 07:10 PM
NO PERMISSION!

But seriously, the mods need to be consistent.

In all seriousness, past posting history and/or demeanor should be considered. It goes back to the core "don't be a douchebag" concept of these boards. I think I'm more impressed that they still haven't banned him for life than I am concerned about their supposed double standards.

marquee moon
06-16-2014, 07:15 PM
Allegedly.

Why? Has the chair of your department asked you about the strange email he received from Trembling Oaks Cuckoo's Nest?

PhDeac
06-16-2014, 07:15 PM
In all seriousness, past posting history and/or demeanor should be considered. It goes back to the core "don't be a douchebag" concept of these boards. I think I'm more impressed that they still haven't banned him for life than I am concerned about their supposed double standards.

Oh I agree. Unfortunately too many posters get their jollies by egging him on. If enough people thought the board would be better without him, he'd be gone.

The real life stuff here gets real old and the mods do little about it.

RedSoxFaithful
06-16-2014, 07:20 PM
I'm interested in the real life stuff you're referencing. RJ managed to whip up a ban for someone posting a video for a company for which he sought out advice on these boards. I don't see much real life info on here going unpunished. I say this, of course, as both a #usualsuspect and a dude who has brought his own real life onto these boards in the past.

I think my personal philosophy on that end is, if you bring your real name onto the boards, you lose the right to complain about a lack of privacy. That's how I've always felt about people using my personal information, and that's the way the boards have operated at least in relation to the Strattons. RJ (and maybe Lectro) is the only one who really gets special treatment in that respect.

Demon09
06-16-2014, 09:32 PM
Because fair or not, he's just run out of advocates by wearing us all down. We determined it was a bannable offense and banned him. Have we let other bannable offenses go in the past, when we shouldn't have? Probably. Some of those instances have been previous RJ flareups. Maybe we should've banned him (and/or others) then, and this would've been avoided. Who knows. Best we can hope for is that this impacts the future for the better. Or something.

This was written about a 60+ year old man.

BiffTannen
06-17-2014, 09:40 AM
In all seriousness, past posting history and/or demeanor should be considered. It goes back to the core "don't be a douchebag" concept of these boards. I think I'm more impressed that they still haven't banned him for life than I am concerned about their supposed double standards.

Agree with this. RJ could probably get banned a couple of times a month just for his general demeanor.

dougie
06-17-2014, 10:08 AM
Agree with this. RJ could probably get banned a couple of times a month just for his general demeanor.

What does this mean? "General demeanor." RJK was almost a mod for these boards and these boards have suffered the consequences of that asshole DV7's decision to blackball sweet prince RJ!!

My understanding is all the other mods were on board with RJ being a mod except DV7. And we are still paying the price.

Hurry back, RJK. These boards desperately need you around.

TownieDeac
06-17-2014, 10:32 AM
thank the jewish gods rj isn't a moderator

qcdeac
06-17-2014, 12:21 PM
so i genuinely don't give a shit about rj getting banned, and think it'll be nice to have him gone for a few days, but is this a hard and fast rule now? see my links above to the dozens and dozens of times it has happened previously on the boards.


like i said, i don't blame y'all for banning him, i wouldn't wanna have to deal with his shit all the time, just curious why it applies now for the first time ever

Townie is scared that he won't be able to post his "just kill yourself" tags anymore.

marquee moon
06-17-2014, 02:28 PM
when RJK returns, I fear he may be crestfallen when he discovers what little, if any, outrage has resulted from his so called illegitimate banning.

even the boards' resident weeping millennial meat curtains sides with the mods here

OldGoldBeard
06-17-2014, 09:31 PM
thank the jewish gods rj isn't a moderator

...


I'm confused. That RJ guy gave your team a compliment.

Why are you acting like a jackass to someone who said something positive about your team?

marquee moon
06-17-2014, 11:52 PM
classic

http://www.ogboards.com/forums/showthread.php/828-New-semi-interesting-article-on-Skeen

Deacon923
06-18-2014, 09:58 AM
RJ is a pain in the ass, but is far, far, far, far less abusive to other posters than Lectro.

Wakeforest22890
06-18-2014, 01:06 PM
Why isn't Lectro banned is my only question. I agree with 923

tsywake
06-18-2014, 01:18 PM
Why isn't Lectro banned is my only question. I agree with 923

He's actually been banned in the past, he just isnt currently. If there are any specific instances that are banworthy, shoot one of us a PM. We can only address what we see, so we rely on notifications from posters quite often to compensate for what we miss.

RacerDeac
06-18-2014, 01:41 PM
Can banned users read the message boards?

Appears so...just noticed that his little light is green while catching up on our shitty basketball recruiting:

http://i61.tinypic.com/r2uic1.png

DistrictDeacon
06-18-2014, 01:43 PM
Why isn't Lectro banned is my only question. I agree with 923

Because he's not a giant pain in the mods' ass.

Ayo
06-18-2014, 02:18 PM
Can banned users read the message boards?
No. When you sign in, you're given a message something along the lines of "You have been banned for the following reason: yada yada yada." Can't navigate/read the boards at all.

marquee moon
06-18-2014, 02:24 PM
No. When you sign in, you're given a message something along the lines of "You have been banned for the following reason: yada yada yada." Can't navigate/read the boards at all.

so what in THE hell is RJK up to?

RacerDeac
06-18-2014, 03:02 PM
so what in THE hell is RJK up to?

Hacking the boards, obviously.

Liquid Karma
06-18-2014, 03:36 PM
FYI - RJ's ban ends at roughly 6PM EST.

RacerDeac
06-18-2014, 03:47 PM
FYI - RJ's ban ends at roughly 6PM EST.

Bets on how quickly he makes the first post?

ManhassetDeac
06-18-2014, 10:03 PM
Wasn't one of the premises on which this board was founded is that banning is stupid?

tsywake
06-19-2014, 07:47 AM
Wasn't one of the premises on which this board was founded is that banning is stupid?

Precisely, which is why we've only banned roughly a dozen posters in the 3 years since our founding. Banning someone is honestly a real pain in the ass for us. We don't have many rules or hard lines drawn, but we've got to stick to the ones we do.