Screamindemon3
Well-known member
Does it say something about our youth setup that by far the best American was trained by Parma and plays for Italy?
That's he's a selfish bastard?
Does it say something about our youth setup that by far the best American was trained by Parma and plays for Italy?
That's he's a selfish bastard?
Does it say something about our youth setup that by far the best American was trained by Parma and plays for Italy?
I'll take "He wouldn't be as good as he is now" for 100, Alex.
As the parent of a pre-Academy (U14) player, I can tell you that, at our club, no one plays route 1 soccer. My son's a left back and he's as skilled a passer as any midfielder on his team. They play the right way...I've definitely been impressed with his development since our club went the Academy route. Regardless of what happens down the road, he understands the game better than players even five or ten years ago.
To be fair to Tim Ream, 23 for a player that's come up in our system is not the same as 23 for a kid that's been in a professional environment since they were 13 like Rossi, or others that are developed in other countries. The unfortunate fact is that many of our players are 3 or 4 years behind their counterparts when they go to college rather than start playing professionally at the age of 17. McBride at 23 was a year or two removed from St. Louis U. and nowhere near the player that became a captain at Fulham. When Ream's experience and savvy catches up with his talent, he could be as good a central defender as we've had.
The point is that looking at the results of one tournament to determine that the team is moving backwards is stupid, since at times unrelated activity can affect another team's outcome.
Your kid does NMSC, right?