• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Facebook Gold from Crazies

Currently on Fox News website, near the top: "TAKE COVER? Yellowstone supervolcano could blow faster than thought, destroy all of mankind...'UFO' spotted over Yellowstone volcano?" Also, "Skinny Dippers Disrupt Wedding Reception" and "Naked female intruder eats canned pineapples in Florida woman's house." Not that CNN or MSNBC are exactly models of integrity, but the new Fox News redesigned website looks like an online version of The National Enquirer or Weekly World News - including many of the stories. I'm expecting a "Bat Boy is a LibDem!" story any day now.
 
so the funny thing is that the HC donated the money that Weinstein gave to her campaign to charity, republicans are having a field day with that. so my question is why haven't there been outrage about Murdoch's donations to trump campaign? double standards with republicans are crazy!
 
PhDeac said:
22282009_10106417130181528_5954944854820882708_n.jpg
Click to expand...

Dude needs to charge his phone.
 
warak said:
so the funny thing is that the HC donated the money that Weinstein gave to her campaign to charity, republicans are having a field day with that. so my question is why haven't there been outrage about Murdoch's donations to trump campaign? double standards with republicans are crazy!
Click to expand...

makes you wonder:

1. will she donate the all of the money Weinstein raised for her?

2. will her "charity" be the Clinton foundation?

3. will she also donate the money she and her foundation got from all those misogynistic countries to legitimate charities?
 
Anyone not voting for Clinton in the November election is, at least, a Trump enabler.
 
sailordeac said:
makes you wonder:

1. will she donate the all of the money Weinstein raised for her?

2. will her "charity" be the Clinton foundation?

3. will she also donate the money she and her foundation got from all those misogynistic countries to legitimate charities?
Click to expand...

Please provide one shred of evidence that the Clinton Foundation isn't a "legitimate" charity.
 
Do you know how many people Clinton has personally had executed? Nobody who kills 40+ people can run a legit charity!
 
sailordeac said:
makes you wonder:

1. will she donate the all of the money Weinstein raised for her?

2. will her "charity" be the Clinton foundation?

3. will she also donate the money she and her foundation got from all those misogynistic countries to legitimate charities?
Click to expand...

Literally no matter where she donates it, I'm sure you'll cook up some story about how she is doing it for political or personal gain. National Federation of the Blind? Just trying to lock up that blind vote! You pubs are very creative when it comes to HRC. Nothing she does will ever be enough, because you are all so insanely bias at this point.
 
Last edited:
You know sailor wouldn't expect the same of a Republican.
 
-------
My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”
Here’s my answer:
We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.
We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?
We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?
And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.
I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”
The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today. The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war.
While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War.
During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”
General George Patton was a vulgar-talking, son-of-a-bitch. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.
Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, "You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”
That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.
Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after "the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN. He made it personal.
Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.” ... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. ... They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery.
The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve.
It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.
So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!
----------
 
This isn't Facebook, it's from a Politico article, but it's definitely crazy, so I'm going to put it here.

Seated at the rear of the room, John and Jill Stabley nodded along. The older married couple from Delaware have attended the Values Voter Summit seven previous times, but this year feels different. “Suddenly hopeful,” Jill says. “We grew up in an era where people were thinking of others, and trying to do the right thing—.” John interrupts: “And walking with Christ.” He pauses. “There’s no going back. All these outside people are coming in and tearing us apart.”

By “outside people,” John means immigrants—particularly Muslims, whom he says are undermining the Constitution in pursuit of sharia law. (John believes Obama is a Muslim, and Jill says the Common Core education standards were used to indoctrinate students with Islamic ideology.)
Click to expand...
 
sailordeac said:
makes you wonder:

1. will she donate the all of the money Weinstein raised for her?

2. will her "charity" be the Clinton foundation?

3. will she also donate the money she and her foundation got from all those misogynistic countries to legitimate charities?
Click to expand...

Tit for tat...same thing can be said for Trump, on all counts. Although Trump's foundation has already been found to be fraudulent and shut down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top