Page 347 of 351 FirstFirst ... 247297337342343344345346347348349350351 LastLast
Results 6,921 to 6,940 of 7003

Thread: Ongoing gun violence/injury thread

  1. #6921
    It's been the rule before this country started and before Republicans even existed. You are such a prick.

  2. #6922

    Makes sense to Republicans.

    And to assholes pretending to be in the political ďcenterĒ.
    I love mankind...itís people I canít stand!!

  3. #6923
    The rule has been around for centuries. You never explained how reversing the the rule would possibly work.

    You are a prick. And you whine all the time.

  4. #6924
    Ahhh...not gonna believe you are irritated or aggrieved unless you prove it with a letter from someone you are paying for support.
    I love mankind...itís people I canít stand!!

  5. #6925
    I'm a lawyer dickhead. This is the rule.
    Last edited by centerdeac; 10-08-2020 at 02:05 AM.

  6. #6926
    You are a dickhead lawyer...?

    No proof required.
    I love mankind...itís people I canít stand!!

  7. #6927
    You react poorly to people not kissing your ass.

  8. #6928
    Nah. Donít want you anywhere near my ass.

    Thanks anyway.
    I love mankind...itís people I canít stand!!

  9. #6929
    You are not bright. You still haven't acknowledged that you did not understand the long term legal system of common law.

  10. #6930
    Quote Originally Posted by centerdeac View Post
    The rule has been around for centuries. You never explained how reversing the the rule would possibly work.

    You are a prick. And you whine all the time.
    I am 100% sure that 100 years ago, much less multiple centuries ago, it was not necessary to provide psychiatric medical records to prove emotional distress. That's the issue here, not just "proving damages". You are trying to elide the issue and then calling other posters pricks.

    The rule no doubt varies by state, but I am also sure that many jurisdictions allow proof of emotional distress through personal or witness testimony. Maybe in Florida you're required to go see a psychiatrist and submit the records to prove ED.

    All that said, I'm not sure the state is doing anything wrong here. The lawyers defending the state have the right to make the plaintiffs prove their damages, and psychiatric treatment records are certainly relevant to emotional distress damages. The optics suck, for sure.

  11. #6931
    I disagree with you
    ImTheCaptain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    45,891
    but what if someone gets money that wasn't truly distressed, guys

  12. #6932
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
    PhDeac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    119,704
    Quote Originally Posted by ImTheCaptain View Post
    but what if someone gets money that wasn't truly distressed, guys
    Yeah. That would be the real crime. Someone whose kid died and they were distressed getting money anyway. That would be horrible.

  13. #6933
    Quote Originally Posted by ImTheCaptain View Post
    but what if someone gets money that wasn't truly distressed, guys
    In this case, sure, just give them the money. But on the whole, people claim emotional distress for all sorts of stuff all the time and having some sort of requirement for proof, is probably a good requirement.
    Birds are real.

  14. #6934

  15. #6935

  16. #6936

  17. #6937
    Gun nuts are the most selfish people in the world

  18. #6938
    Quote Originally Posted by BarcaDeac View Post
    Republicans are the most selfish people in the world
    FIFY

  19. #6939
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach O View Post
    Pretty Hawt tho

  20. #6940
    Quote Originally Posted by stugotz View Post
    Pretty Hawt tho
    def would

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •