spiffylubes
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 914
- Reaction score
- 56
They finished today, it's like a new house. So awesome.
Looks great. I may see it mounted to the middle leg on the left in the bottom pic, but I might mount a heavy duty power strip to one of the legs or the surface sides to give easy electrical access for smaller tools.
Finally finished putting together a workshop in my basement.
I'm still working on dust collection. I've got a shop vac with a dust separator setup on a mobile cart that I just plug into things as I use them. I've got a bunch of extra 3 inch tubing to put something more permanent in when I have time.
The table saw is a simple benchtop model I've had for years that I mounted into a torsion box table to give a bigger, flatter surface. I'd put this table up against any of the bigger contractor saws in terms of accuracy and stability for cutting sheets. It bogs down on trying to rip anything over 3/4 inch because the saw is underpowered. I'm keeping my eyes on estate sales for a decent cabinet saw that I can pick up and restore.
The right side of the table is also a router table (the insert is visible). The big assembly/outfeed table is a 6' x 4' torsion box with leg levelers to ensure a perfectly flat work area.
Not pictured behind me is another 20 feet of open space that I'm going to section off with tarps and use for a finishing area.
I bought at 10" Kobalt sliding compound last year around this time. Used it to make half a dozen cuts, and at the end of an 8" cut, it was already off by 1/8". I returned it a couple days later. I was less than impressed.Brand of mitre saw doesn't mean much. Buy a Kobalt sliding compound mitre instead and spend the difference on a finish blade and you'll get much better cuts.
I bought at 10" Kobalt sliding compound last year around this time. Used it to make half a dozen cuts, and at the end of an 8" cut, it was already off by 1/8". I returned it a couple days later. I was less than impressed.
Max VOC (volatile organic compounds, those chemicals that are released into the air as a finish dries) is an EPA clean air requirement. Newer formulations of surface finishes are supposed to be lower in VOC's than older ones. That really has little to do with how "baby safe" the finished surface is. However, the long cure time means that the surface will be off-gassing for the time recommended for curing the finish. I certainly would not use it before the recommended cure time had passed.
I would look for a finish coating that is labeled as approved for food contact use under US Food and Drug Administration rules.
The two routes of exposure your baby would have are skin contact when on the surface and (minor) ingestion of any surface material that would rub off on the kid's hands and feet and be transferred to mouth when kid sucks on fingers/toes. If the material continues to off-gas (release those VOC's) then obviously the gases would be very close to where baby would be breathing. That too should be avoided.
VOC's are everywhere in our world. They make the wonderful aromas from good food. They are the "new car" smell. They are perfume, flowers, air fresheners, etc. So, not all of them are bad.
In many paint, varnish, shellac, urethane and other finishes and glues made in years past, the VOC's that were emitted as the product dried were pretty toxic.Thus the "use with adequate ventilation" warnings on many of them. Most of the really bad VOC's have been eliminated. That is also why you will hear people complain that newer formulations of products don't work as well as the older ones. But they are much safer to use.
Bottom line: I would look for a coating that is FDA approved for food contact surface and make sure to cure it for the recommended length of time before using it.