• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Online Virtual Coach Simulation

Congrats to DiV for winning the DeACCon Invitational!

1. Carbondale...5-0
2. Flagstaff....5-1
3. Philadelphia.5-1
4. Frankfort....4-2
5. Boca Raton...3-2
6. Duluth.......3-3
7. Dearborn.....2-4
7. Odessa.......2-3
9. Pittsburgh...1-5
10. Cincinnati..1-5
11. Eugene......1-5


Frankfort got smashed in rematch of last season's title game vs Philly, 74-48. Team shot 36%. Ouch. I had to tell the team that "Bernard Tuttle and Rodrigo Lott are not coming through those doors." Man, I wish they were though. :tear:

Glad to see everyone win a game. Thanks for playing. This is a tough tournament.
 
Frankfort's maxes:

Kevin Hatton r10
Ronald Neal r29
Calvin Faulk r18

Taking two lottery type guys and hopefully and under the radar guy. For the new coaches, recruiting players out of position in HS has gone from clever to conventional. Hoping for a successful net to back up the riskier maxes, but Hatton and Hall are Lear/Hutchings (former greats for Frankfort/Boca) type players.

After putting points on Friday's NR's,

Kevin Hatton r10 (1)
Ronald Neal r29 (42)
Calvin Faulk r18 (NR, but at least swooper is on him as well)

With so few of the other predicted recruits being ranked, I wonder how many people are on Hatton. Without a maxes thread until very late, there was no way to scare folks off popular recruits. Neal finally comes in at 42, and will undoubtedly climb. Glad to be on him instead of Hall. swooper thought/hoped he had Faulk all to himself. He has a slight edge on me for him due F- local pref. SSC has my Fit at 96% though.
 
Here's my list:

Sean Zambrano (46)
Homer Davies (16)
Milton Vega (15)
Willie Carrier
Eduardo Thompson

I know Zambrano, Davies, and Thompson were ties. Vega's ranking is high, but I have a hunch it's mostly netters. Carrier is probably going to be a much-needed CL.
And got confirmation this morning that I'm not alone on Carrier. This just went from bad to worse.
 
Flagstaff picked up a 62-49 in a very defensive minded game. Got my defense back to playing well after getting torched by Boca. I have got to figure out what is going on with Paul Livingston, went 0-7 for 4 points and 5 rebounds. Great production for a 6'10 EXC shot and EXC rebounder :rulz:

My recruiting came in pretty well,

Sean Zambrano - 46
Howard Stark - NR
Nick Weaver - NR
Kevin Hatton - 1

The league seems to have all figured out the Poor scout guys and don't over look them anymore. Have 8 guys out of 20 unranked in my net. I almost switched from Stark to Francis Kaiser but didn't after seeing awaken's top 75. And of course he comes in unranked. At least Stark is unranked as well. Will be interesting to see how many people are on Hatton, as I could see him being netted by several coaches that aren't really paying attention. Could also see him being a 9/9 with all of them being top 20 teams haha.

Looks like no good news in Flagstaff. After the processing today I have:


Sean Zambrano - 7
Howard Stark - 46
Nick Weaver - 60
Kevin Hatton - 1

I still feel great about my chances with all, as I fit the prefs well for each. Hope the net turns out a few guys as well.
 
And got confirmation this morning that I'm not alone on Carrier. This just went from bad to worse.

If you choose to bail on the max 5 strategy and haven't spent RP's for this week, you could drop two maxes and use the 34 points to put 3 RP's on 11 recruits to build your net. OR, just drop one max and put 1 RP on 17 recruits and be @ 14 RPE instead of 16 RPE.
 
Sorry to pile on, RedSox, but I maxed Vega. He was the only big I maxed, so I'm planning to stick with him. I was glad to see that two of my other maxes were unranked.

Also, Congrats to everyone in the DeACCon tourney. I'll be back in next season and will hopefully give some people a run.
 
Sorry to pile on, RedSox, but I maxed Vega. He was the only big I maxed, so I'm planning to stick with him. I was glad to see that two of my other maxes were unranked.

Also, Congrats to everyone in the DeACCon tourney. I'll be back in next season and will hopefully give some people a run.
You are the worst.
 
Jetlag Bowl III Preview

So, as my Evansville Rachelwoods head into their third-ever Jetlag Bowl on Monday night, I thought now might be a good time to preview the game vs Boca Raton.

The history:
There isn't much. Heading into our first matchup with the Storm, we were 1-2, and headed to a miserable season. At the time, I knew it was bad, though I probably wasn't aware of how bad it was. It ended up being a 106-71 blowout for Boca. The second game was at the height of our struggles last season, and we somehow managed to trim our margin of defeat to 79-48 (improvement!)

The S69 Rachelwoods:
Things are considerably different this year. Evansville heads into their C13 opener with a 3-0 record, thanks mostly to an extraordinarily easy schedule, but also a much-hyped recruiting class. Through three games, Evansville has the #23 L7 scorer (PG John Lawson, 23.0 ppg), the #2 and #3 C13 scorers (Lawson and SF Monte Bueno, 23.0 ppg), and the #4, #5, and #6 C13 rebounders. It all adds up to a much-improved team.

Lawson is a scoring point guard, with most of that scoring coming from outside (83.1% of his shot attempts from long range). Despite those long range shot attempts, he's an incredibly efficient shooter (50%). He also leads the team in fouls drawn, with 4 per game. It all adds up to an offensive powerhouse of a player, and certainly one that we're lucky to have bringing the ball up every possession.

The only other guy on the roster with more than 25 shots is Bueno. He's a great rebounding, great scoring small forward. Somehow even more efficient than Lawson, Bueno has evenly distributed his shot attempts (15% close, 29% mid, 46% long), and he's shooting 65% overall. His hands are stupid good, too, as he leads the team in touches per turnover (303.0). If he has a good game, so will the Rachelwoods.

The most important returning players are sophomore SG Antonio Brinson and senior C Shaun Schreier. Brinson was second on the team in scoring last year, but did so mostly as a volume shooter. Because of his inefficiency, along with the presences of Bueno and Lawson, Brinson has been asked to redefine his game. So far, he's mostly succeeded, surprisingly playing the best defense on the team, and staying out of the way on offense. The team does best when he doesn't touch the ball much, but if he thinks he can hit whatever open looks he gets, he'll take them. Like Lawson, he's mostly a sniper.

Schreier was also asked to reshape his game this offseason, and he's also done well so far. Always a heavy rebounder, he's now become a last resort type on offense. His blocks have been down this year, but he was a big presence in the paint last year (1.5 BPG), and he's held opponents to just 2/15 shooting through 3 games. If he can continue to play his part as a defensive specialist in the post, the Rachelwoods could have some big games against undersized teams. Unfortunately, Boca Raton is far from undersized, and I'd imagine that Schreier will struggle against their more imposing bigs.

The rest of the team has done about as well as expected. Freshman PF Willis Baker has done well as an undersized all-around forward. He rebounds well, and can score in the paint, but his defense has been mediocre. Sophomore Kevin Volz has been tried at every position but SG since joining Evansville, but he's now carved out a role as their backup C. He leads the team in +/-, though that might be more of a damning indicator of Schreier's struggles than anything else. He's 6'9", and not at all a good rebounder. In addition to that, his lack of size in the paint causes his shots to be blocked an inordinate amount. That being said, he has great court vision, and plays very good defense. Because of his size/rebounding disparity, he's probably going to end up as a career backup.

The S69 Storm:
Boca graduated the best player in their program's history last year in Bert Hutchings. It doesn't look like they've slowed at all. John Lawson will have his hands full with JR PG Mo Poisson. Poisson was C13's Freshman of the Year, and had a strong sophomore year. This year, Poisson's got a shot to have his best season yet.

Mo's not without his weaknesses, though. He's currently averaging 20.7 PPG, though he seems to struggle from long range. Despite shooting a staggering 73% on his 3.7 short- and mid-range shot attempts per game, he's shooting just 43% on 7.7 long-range shot attempts per game. Luckily, Poisson does draw nearly 6 (!) fouls per game, though he's only shooting 64% from the line. Finally, defense has never been Poisson's strong suit, and Lawson should be able to have a field day on Monday. Poisson's FG% allowed is an unreal 64.7%.

Of course, the Storm are far from over reliant on Poisson, and that's where JR SG Erin Atkins comes in. Atkins has never averaged fewer than 18 PPG, and he scores with all of the efficiency that Poisson lacks. He's also a considerably better defender. Though he's allowed a FG% of 51.9% this year, he leads Boca in created turnovers, and could be a nightmare for Antonio Brinson if Brinson gets too many touches. Atkins does have some issues with turnovers, but his hands aren't as bad as this year's 3.0 TO/PG would suggest... 5 of his 9 turnovers this season came in Boca's loss to powerhouse Philadelphia. The only other significant weakness with Atkins seems to be an inability to create his own shot. He leads the team in assists received, with 4.7, which might indicate that he's a catch and shoot type that could be dangerous with screens. Brinson's lack of athleticism could really hurt him there.

As far as bigs go, Boca Raton's had a bit of a crisis there early on. They have a lot of options for their frontcourt, and while it looks like the Storm have settled on JR SF Michael Gonzalez, SR PF Leon Cochran, and SO C Bruce Truong, there's no telling how that lineup could look on Monday night. Cochran's the most interesting guy of the three, as an elite recruit that mostly underwhelmed in his first three years. In two games as a starter, he's averaged 20 PPG and 6 RPG. He actually shoots most of his attempts from outside, though he's obviously most effective (85.7%) in the paint. Like most of both teams' players, he hasn't been great defensively, though he could offer a steal and a block per game with 30 minutes. Truong might be the scarier player, as he's put up elite rebounding and defensive numbers so far this season, against some tough competition.

The big problem we're going to have with the Storm is their bench. There's really no weakness there, and guys like FR bPG Jake Evans could start for most teams. He's played exceptional defense this season, and has scored efficiently (if rarely). SO bPF Wilbur Cowan hasn't played in a ton of games, but when he has, he's been mostly solid (currently leading the team in rebound % and playing suffocating defense).

The prediction: 86-73, Boca Raton
Things will be better for the Rachelwoods than in games 1 and 2, but the Storm's depth and athleticism will be too much for Evansville to handle. Atkins should have a huge night, and should Cowan get a lot of minutes, he could stifle offensive production from Baker. Lawson and Bueno will keep it close (though I think Gonzalez's exceptional defensive play will hold Bueno to the worst shooting night of his young career), and the buckets will be flowing, but it's a win for Boca Raton. If we lose by 30+ again, I'll be sending Stormfury a bill for a new laptop and a window replacement.
 
Of course not... was just hoping for one CL lol.

Your chasing talent. Your more often going to have NO CLs than any when you chase top talent and especially bigs.

Boca's maxes
Sang Vinci (72)
Devin Cook (21)
Charles Lomonaco (6)
I opted to drop off Harris (18) to strengthen my net.

About half of my net is in the top 75 as well.
 
Red Sox, that is a hell of a write-up...more in depth than anything that will be said about Wake/Wofford. What viewer are you using to get the advanced stats?

Also, general recruiting questions: I have 6 or 7 high value targets in my net who are currently unranked. Assuming I'm willing to take the risk that they are small maxes, is 37 points enough to put me in a strong position at the reveal? I was thinking about getting 3 or 4 of them to 20 this week and then maxing 1 or 2 who remain unranked and undiscussed the next, but if people are likely to have netters around 50 I may just bank points for the reveal.
 
That's a huge risk. That extra 19 points is completely wasted if a player is maxed by even just one player.
 
It definitely is a big risk. I was estimating about an 80% chance of being maxed is about as good as I could get with the assumptions that he's not ranked, has not been mentioned anywhere, but still looked good enough to me to be a valuable target. (If this is way off let me know).

But, if literally everyone else is scared off, it seems well worth a 20 pt bet for a 1/5 chance at a clear on a very good player. I wouldn't expect that to be the case, though, so I guess I'm trying to figure out where others might land to see what kind of odds I'd be looking at if I do hit an unmaxed guy.

Fwiw, I'm only maxing two as a small program so if I spend no other points, I'd have 70+ pts banked at the reveal.
 
If you're only maxing two, it makes more sense.

Can somebody look at the Top 75 and explain why #29 Marc Saad and #30 Jonathan Cooper are in the Top 75. All I can figure is that they had a ton of assists after the first two or three games.
 
Last edited:
The best explanation I could come up with for them and a few other guys is that some teams really wanted high local prefs in the r 21-24 range.
 
Cooper, maybe I could see... He looks like a pretty safe +3 guy. Still a huge stretch.

Saad, I'd be willing to be it's a bunch of CPU coaches. It has to be.
 
Back
Top