awaken, this is what I've got. My system predicts stats based on HS stats and I calculate the normal distribution of those stats among comparable players. In this case, I compare players to every player 6-7 or under to figure out which ones are projected to be around the top 7% in Points, Assists, Steals, and Turnovers. The normal score is capped at 2. The score below is the highest score x 2.5 + 2nd highest score x 1.25 + 3rd highest score x .75 + lowest score x .5.
The theoretical range is from -10 to 10. The actual scores range from -8.7 to 9.6. From what I've seen, 5.5 means a player is in the Top 10% of potential PGs. Anything 8 or above is elite. For example, Earl Lyles is 9.04 (#13 in the last 20 seasons) and rated as an elite scorer, defender, and ballhandler at PG. He'll probably rate higher at SG and SF when I do those.
According to this system, the best current PGs are the following players (8.75+):
Agustin Todd 6.1 pts, 4.0 ast, 1.8 to last season (benched for a PG from a 4/6 class)
Brian Douglas 17 pts, 3.7 ast, 0.7 to
Cody Webb NA for Boca (?)
Albert Colbert 11.8 pts, 5.0 ast, 2.0 stl, 1.7 to
Judson Desimone 2.0 pts, 3.3 ast, 0.2 to