• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

SCOTUS decisions

Junebug said:
That’s some solid tweeting: claims the unitary executive theory “has no textual basis” yet links to a Vox article that sets forth the unitary executive theory’s textual basis.
Click to expand...

That’s some solid posting. Claims the author claims there’s no textual basis yet ignores the next tweet.

 
sorry pard, but you used to try and act like some type of highly principled conservative instead of the goofy hack you have proven yourself to be
 
Milhouse said:
sorry pard, but you used to try and act like some type of highly principled conservative instead of the goofy hack you have proven yourself to be
Click to expand...

Trump made it so they don’t have to pretend anymore.
 
Fishbelt Deac said:
Is this thread where we put nominations for federal judge who are partisan hacks with no real legal experience?

If so:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/arti...uring-hearing-for-nominee-rated-not-qualified
Click to expand...

https://ballotpedia.org/ABA_ratings_during_the_Trump_administration

The Trump administration notified the American Bar Association (ABA) on March 17, 2017, that the group would no longer receive special access to background information on judicial candidates prior to their nomination. A letter to the ABA from White House Counsel Donald F. McGahn II said that all organizations would receive the background information in equal fashion.[1]

Some ABA supporters criticized the action as retaliation against the group’s low ratings of several of President Trump’s judicial nominees. Some critics contended that the ABA ratings favored liberal judges over conservatives.

As of September 25, 2019, the ABA had rated 188 of President Trump’s nominees; 124 were rated “well-qualified,” 56 were rated “qualified,” and eight were rated “not qualified.”
Click to expand...

Why do Republicans love nominating "not qualified" individuals?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top