- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 23,228
- Reaction score
- 6,362
this thread was way better before people started responding to rj
The same can be said of every non-horse racing thread that RJ posts on.
this thread was way better before people started responding to rj
The same can be said of every non-horse racing thread that RJ posts on.
Show me where I specifically said this.
EL-OH-EL. I won't threadjack, I'll just quietly note by objection to this sweeping and inaccurate conclusion, since we've had many, many threads where you guys advocate FOR de jure discrimination solely on the basis of race BY our government.
EL-OH-EL. I won't threadjack, I'll just quietly note by objection to this sweeping and inaccurate conclusion, since we've had many, many threads where you guys advocate FOR de jure discrimination solely on the basis of race BY our government.
God you're insufferable. This isn't what we're talking about at all. And everything I said is completely accurate in the context of this discussion.
Just remember to distinguish between the types of racial discrimination you favor from those you don't and there won't be any confusion.
Let's just make sure we stick to the topic on the thread instead of trolling like 4 year olds.
The comment I was responding to in which you alluded that this leaves the door open for "that" to come to pass. "That" being "Further, if you can use religion to deny certain aspects of healthcare, why can't you use religion to deny service to gay people? Or single women?"
This is not true, for the last time. This decision in no way has any impact on corporations denying aspects on the basis of people being gay or single women, or women at all for that matter. It solely deals with closed corporations using this one exemption and perhaps a handful of others under the ACA.
rj and has conservative brother from another mother jhmd have arrived.
This thread officially sucks.
Says the guy who brought race into it for no reason....(beyond tradition).
And four members of the Supreme Court and many other experts agree with me that this has opened the door for other exemptions.
The POTUS said it puts the health of employed women at risk.
But keep making it about RJ. It's much easier that dealing with the facts that others are saying the same things I have.
Keep bringing up outside issues. The reality is that a door is open.
According others, this is also the first time that corporations have been given religious rights. There is now a precedent to expand these rights.
I'm out for about 90 minutes.
Lol RJ was quoting protected classes so I mistakenly included race. Thanks for stopping by and offering up your intelligent comments though. This thread is considerably better off with your idiotic comments.
There is a lot of stupid going on in this thread and the whole case just really reinforces how poorly conceived and executed the ACA was.
Just switch to a single payer system and get rid of all this bullshit about what company doesn't want to provide which benefit because it is prohibited by whatever deity.
Gotta show people that halfway doesn't really work first. Single payer's coming eventually.