Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
Lol I think this is an absurd line:
"Before the advent of ACA, they were not legally compelled to provide insurance, but they nevertheless did so—in part, no doubt, for conventional business
reasons, but also in part because their religious beliefs govern their relations with their employees."
Just shows you that the line between "acting on religious grounds" and "taking action for business reasons" are just going to be blurred and basically explained away to favor religion. Do we really think for a second that the reason the company was giving out health benefits was because of their religious beliefs? No, they almost certainly gave benefits because it kept them competitive in the marketplace.
"Before the advent of ACA, they were not legally compelled to provide insurance, but they nevertheless did so—in part, no doubt, for conventional business
reasons, but also in part because their religious beliefs govern their relations with their employees."
Just shows you that the line between "acting on religious grounds" and "taking action for business reasons" are just going to be blurred and basically explained away to favor religion. Do we really think for a second that the reason the company was giving out health benefits was because of their religious beliefs? No, they almost certainly gave benefits because it kept them competitive in the marketplace.