I do actually agree with this part:
""Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today's decision."
It will all have to be litigated at some point at what I would imagine to be a relatively large expense. The cases though are only going to come from closely-held corporations with objections to certain exemptions. Beyond that I can't think of anything it would cover.
""The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield."
I pretty much agree that it's ventured into an area where there could be a lot of forthcoming litigation.