on a scale of "meh" to "ruined your day" how bad is this, exactly?
He's just saying it's pretentious.
on a scale of "meh" to "ruined your day" how bad is this, exactly?
ex mrs diggler has that ms/her crap on her signature and it's definitely pretentious shit.
don't think this is pretentious, but perhaps belongs on the pet peeve thread
Maybe not the goal, but also saves time googling foreign names to try to figure out if male or female.
It certainly creates pretense.
Also implies that someone gives a shit what you call yourself versus what they feel like calling you.
I saw a baby girl James on Facebook a couple weeks ago :shrug
Why do I need to be tipped off about their pronouns? Is that any different than tipping me off about their shoe size or hair color or favorite sex position? The "M.D." clearly reflects something about the doctor's professional abilities, which makes sense in a professional email that may pertain to the content of the email. The fact that some particular pronouns match the common pronouns usually associated with this guy's name has no relevance to anything.
it has nothing to do with whether or not you can guess the biological sex of the person
the relevance is that some people want to know how to refer to a person ahead of time. also, it's probably a standardized corporate signature; just because it's David this time doesn't mean it's not "Sam" or "Ellis" next time.
In a reply to a person, why would you be referring to them using third-person pronouns?
imagine for a moment a world where it's possible that a person could be involved in an email involving several people at once
Then it would be better to use the person's name, rather than an ambiguous pronoun that could apply to multiple people in the email chain.
I literally can't think of a time I've had to make a choice about what 3rd person pronoun to use in an email.