Have voted for pro-life pols before, but would never vote for someone who advocates no abortions under any circumstances. Makes no sense to me from a pro-life standpoint. As noted, life of the mother is a tiny fraction so can't understand why the GOP won't allow those minimal exceptions. Both Mitt and McCain supported exceptions for rape and invest as well. GOP panders to abortion opposition during the convention, but they don't eat their own cooking on the national level.
Why isn't viability good enough? I thought we established back on other threads that as our medical technology and expertise increase*, viability will move closer and closer to conception and eventually wipe out abortion.
*God's plan
Had UNCG ever made a post that was relevant and true?
Most Americans are in a well defined pro-choice for policy yet anti-abortion personally middle.
Had UNCG ever made a post that was relevant and true?
Most Americans are in a well defined pro-choice for policy yet anti-abortion personally middle.
It's vexing how the pro-lifers - ostensibly passionately interested in protecting unborn babies - don't put all their time, energy, and money into:
1) improving and bolstering adoption services and culture
2) de-stigmatizing single-mother childbirths
3) increasing the availability of birth control, up to and including free
4) improving the economic situation in America.