Strickland33
Well-known member
Numbers, these arguments are really weak. Actually, children are a plus benefit for society. In fact, they are so important that society literally cannot do without them. A woman's right to greater convenience trumps the right to life of another, in this case, specifically her child? What are you saying? You can't seriously mean that anyone's convenience tops another person's right to exist? You can't be serious.
Ask yourself this: what child, no matter what their circumstances, would prefer to have been aborted rather than live?
I guess the late capitalist mode of production does require an influx of baby-powered batteries to keep the gears turning.