Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
I am not sure if you meant that the way it reads, but that is a very dangerous way to decide something like abortion. If we just look at a cost benefit analysis on whether society benefits should those potential lives be allowed. There was some really ugly pre-WWII thinking that went along those lines. We could certainly solve social security using that line of thought.
Regardless of which side you are on there should be a fundamental moral equation that guides your convictions regardless of the cost or benefit to society. If not, olds like me better start watching our backs.
Well this is where democratic choice comes in. We all get to vote.