Did I miss it, did that hillbilly terrorist apologize for shooting police officers?
I believe the preferred term is "workplace violence." He didn't do that. That was the board left who was quick to make excuses for homicide as some sort of assumed risk (a reasoning not recognized by the laws of our country).
MM claims that "this" is on Republicans, but the police officers killed in the week following the "What do we want? Dead Cops!" march is somehow not---by his own reasoning---on Dems.
And videos should speak for themselves. Until they shouldn't, because they were "heavily edited". Or something.
Can we learn to derive renewable, domestic energy from the vented guilt of coddled, naive microaggression survivors? Because if so, say your prayers, Saudi.
Link please
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91c_1418577134
So if "this" was "on Republicans", surely "that" was on you guys, right?
What Democratic politician said that they wanted dead cops? Or even came close to that level of hateful rhetoric?
What are you even talking about?
Nothing has killed more people on this planet than religion. Not even the fucking plague.
Do you plan on attempting to quantify deaths by religion or are we sticking to the realm of probably?Only that's probably not even close to true. In just two instances of the plague (14th century, plague of Justinian), around 100 million people died.
I don't know how you can even attempt to draw a parallel. Democrats are truthfully calling attention to illegal actions by police officers that are supported by video evidence. Republicans are untruthfully distorting information about legal actions by Planned Parenthood for the clear purpose of misinforming people. If Republicans were actually telling the truth about Planned Parenthood then I don't think they would have any blame for this.
And that doesn't even address the fact that facing violence is definitively part of the job for police officers and definitively NOT a part of the job for abortion clinic cases.
Do you have a recommendation for a source (ideally academic since you're talking about casual relationships) that shows this relationship? I'd be interested in taking a look!
Do you have a recommendation for a source (ideally academic since you're talking about casual relationships) that shows this relationship? I'd be interested in taking a look!
Do you think the ubiquitous rhetoric from Republicans in the wake of the edited and fabricated PP videos, respectively, is comparable to the power of the rhetoric in the video that you cited? Which message do you think spread farther geographically and across different media? Asking for a friend.I found the video of Democrats marching in the street demanding that cops be killed to, ahem, speak for itself. Six days later they got what they wanted.
Just take the L, champ.
Because I asked TR, but thanks for the suggestion!Why don't you ask MysteryMen, who made the seminal declaration of "this" being on "Republicans"?
Please ignore this question.
What Democratic politician said that they wanted dead cops? Or even came close to that level of hateful rhetoric?
What are you even talking about?
Okay, so it was armchair statistical analysis. Just wanted to clarify.Not really. As I said, I don't think the relationship exists. You probably would have realized that if you had carefully read my post, which you of course did not. You guys are the ones attempting to blame Republicans for this guy's actions. Seems like the onus is on you to produce the studies. I am only trying to point out a double standard.