They are no good options. I see two ways forward.
1) The Trump approach: Wall our selves off from the problem allowing the Muslims to fight it out amongst themselves probably leading to lots of death and suffering and a difficult to predict outcome. I would suggest that this approach will on the short term save American lives but in the long run will be very costly since Russia will probably just take over the Middle East on the pretense of peace keeping. Alternatively Further increasing conflicts will likely spill over in to Israel and Europe, and that will eventually force us to get involved under the rules of NATO or to save/protect Israel. The only way to keep our selves out of this in the long term is to become completely energy independent and politically isolationist very quickly. So, take all the money we save not re-invading Iraq, etc, and build a motherfucking-shit ton of windmills and electric cars. Additionally, climate change predictions indicate that vast swaths of the middle east (the core of the islamofascist world) will, within 50 to 80 years, be uninhabitable for humans due to extreme heat and lack of water... so, maybe this problem will just solve itself if we contain it for long enough.
2) Full scale D-day type invasion and subsequent Marshall type plan for the Middle East, and north/central African. The ultimate objective of WW2 was to stamp out the awful Nazi and Fascist ideas and philosophies that were the main stream in Germany, Spain, Italy and Japan. A war on an idea is difficult to conceive and organize and I believe eventually will require a full scale invasion and eradication of the adherents of those bad ideas. The allies during the lead up to WW2 and in the war's early stages did not realize this and believed that containing the problem or restricting the ideas to just Germany (etc.) was an adequate strategy. But they eventually realized there was no other choice. They had to invade and they had to round up and stamp out all the adherents to the bad idea. Of course the bad idea of Nazism still persists, but the ultimate success of DDay was because we were able to eliminate the idea from the main stream zeitgeist.
These two really bad options are the ways forward that I can see, if the problem is really as pervasive as it seems. I don't advocate for either of them. I suppose the half way approach that Obama has taken, of moderate military engagement and moderate political engagement while not really acknowledging the actual core of the real problem, is just as likely to be successful so we could also just continue down that road.