• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Son of Stormfront founder renounces white nationalism politics

myDeaconmyhand

myDeaconmyhand

First man to get a team of horses up Bear Mountain
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
39,614
Reaction score
9,454
Location
Winston
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...5f906a-8f3b-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html

A very cool story about Derek Black:

"He was not only a leader of racial politics but also a product of them. His father, Don Black, had created Stormfront, the Internet’s first and largest white nationalist site, with 300,000 users and counting. His mother, Chloe, had once been married to David Duke, one of the country’s most infamous racial zealots, and Duke had become Derek’s godfather. They had raised Derek at the forefront of the movement, and some white nationalists had begun calling him “the heir.”

Now Derek spoke in Memphis about the future of their ideology. “The Republican Party has to be either demolished or taken over,” he said. “I’m kind of banking on the Republicans staking their claim as the white party.”"
 
Gotta give credit to the Bobs that they have only run with the sensationalistic immigration politics, and so far avoided the white nationalism aspect. You have to be super naive to not see how those ideologies coincide, and it's no wonder because they originated together.

Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
 
Are you seriously trying to say that Stormfront isn't a racist organization?
 
Of course you don't...Just like you accept Steve Bannon as not being a leader of the alt-right (white nationalist) movement.
 
You're the one who uses Briebart as your bible. Brietbart is one of the largest voices for white nationalism in the US. There is no doubt about this.

http://americasvoice.org/press_rele...trump-hires-breitbarts-white-nationalist-ceo/

"Prominent GOPer: “That only shows that there are no Republican leaders of Lincolnian stature”

When choosing new leadership to revamp his struggling campaign, Trump looked past mainstream Republican options and instead chose Stephen Bannon. As the former executive chairman for Breitbart News, Bannon spearheaded a website notorious for conspiracy theories and white nationalism.

Under Bannon’s leadership, Breitbart became the home of Trumpism before Trump. It then became known as “Trumpbart” as Bannon turned the outlet into “Trump Pravda.” According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, and not surprisingly, it became the favorite place for the so-called “Alt-Right” — white supremacists interested in mainstreaming their views:

“Breitbart recently published a lengthy defense of the Alt-Right, claiming the white nationalists such as Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor who created the ideology “have been accused of racism,” choosing to ignore the well-documented openly-racist views. But Breitbart’s open defense of the Alt-Right didn’t appear out of thin air. Over the past year the media outlet has been openly promoting the core issues of the Alt-Right, introducing these racist ideas to its readership – much to the delight of many in the white nationalist world who could never dream of reaching such a vast number of people. Breitbart has always given a platform to parts of the radical right, most notably elements of the organized anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant movements. Breitbart has also organized conferences featuring nativist speakers and published op-eds and interviews with movement leaders. But since 2015, Breitbart began publishing more overtly racist diatribes about Muslims and immigrants.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/steve-bannon-and-the-alt-right-a-primer/

"What is there left to say about the alt-right? Let’s just start with the basics.

Their numbers are hard to quantify, but they have a large social media presence, particularly on Twitter, which they use to harass journalists and conservatives, particularly Jewish ones. They’re fond of internet memes, have their own little shibboleths (such as their tactic of putting parenthesis around the names of Jewish users​), and are generally young, white, and male.

They also have a presidential candidate they love, Donald Trump, and a conservative news site of their own: Breitbart, which up until a couple days ago was run by new Trump consigliere SteveBannon​.

Bannon’s Breitbart distinguished itself from the rest of the conservative media in two significant ways this cycle. The first was becoming a mouthpiece for Trump while other, older conservative periodicals were declaring war on him​. The second was through their embrace of the alt-right, which mainstream conservatives tend to abhor."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ill_kristol_a_renegade_jew_is_disgusting.html

Brietbart called Bill Kristol a "renegage Jew"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8441/i-know-trumps-new-campaign-chairman-steve-bannon-ben-shapiro

I could give a hundred more such articles. It's not about disagreeing. It's that either you have head buried so deeply in the sand that you ignore overwhelming evidence that Brietbart is a racist site. Or maybe you agree with them and are too chickenshit to admit it.

You simply don't like the light of day or disinfecting truth.
 
sailordeac said:
once again, disagreement = racism; that's just clear thinking
Click to expand...
Crazy that you would manage to badly misinterpret a two sentence post, with the first sentence being in direct opposition to what you said. Maybe you are referring to David Duke and Don Black? Am I incorrect in labeling their ideology as racist?
 
myDeaconmyhand said:
Crazy that you would manage to badly misinterpret a two sentence post, with the first sentence being in direct opposition to what you said. Maybe you are referring to David Duke and Don Black? Am I incorrect in labeling their ideology as racist?
Click to expand...

I think David Duke was a registered Dem up until the 90s. I don't recall the Clinton's ever being asked to disavow.
 
Many about Muslims. You show your bigotry every time you do.

The mere fact you use Brietbart as your primary shows a lot. There's no question who Brietbart is and what their agenda is. For you to use them over and over and over again, shows either you don't understand who they are or support them.
 
Be Accurate, I called you a bigot not a racist:

"Many about Muslims. You show your bigotry every time you do. "

Yes, you can criticize it, but you go way beyond that.

The fact that you almost exlusively use Britbart (https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alternative-right ) for your "source" is a major issue as stated before. That you refuse to admit who Brietbart is can easily mean you support their political agenda.
 
Last edited:
sailordeac said:
I was referring to mdmh's post right before mine, I have no idea what Stormfront is
Click to expand...

This is a sign that sailor is out of touch with his party and that he didn't read the article.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top