• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

DEMOCRATS SHOULD ASK CLINTON TO STEP ASIDE

Donald Trump's resume has all of those things. The solace folks seem to find in this idea that Trump's lack of experience will be overcome by his willingness to listen to advisors is bizarre to me.

Wait, what? And who did you vote for the past two presidential cycles? It was the same exact mentality.

Obama-Smiling-Idiot-1.jpg
 
Terrible analogy that you continue to advance.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk

Please explain. How was Obama any more relevantly experienced than Trump? And was it not Obama's strategy to appoint advisers for his inexperienced (read: all) areas? Do you remember the number of "czars" at the beginning? Dude couldn't even open an umbrella without consulting Reggie Love.
 
No, Bob, just the actually racist ones, like yourself.

Wasn't it you that adamantly insisted that only racists called others racist because "it takes one to know one" or something?
 
Please explain. How was Obama any more relevantly experienced than Trump? And was it not Obama's strategy to appoint advisers for his inexperienced (read: all) areas? Do you remember the number of "czars" at the beginning? Dude couldn't even open an umbrella without consulting Reggie Love.

He had a basic understanding of government and a career of public service. He also wasn't a sexual predator.
 
And was it not Obama's strategy to appoint advisers for his inexperienced (read: all) areas? Do you remember the number of "czars" at the beginning? Dude couldn't even open an umbrella without consulting Reggie Love.

Do you honestly believe Trump will appoint such people, much less consult with them? This is the same guy who basically told his campaign managers to go fuck themselves and announced that the "shackles" were off.
 
He had a basic understanding of government and a career of public service. He also wasn't a sexual predator.

I'm not voting for Trump, but I would wager that his career has resulted in exponentially more public service than Obama's at the time of their respective nominations. And I question Obama's basic understanding of government given some of his early moves, most notably GM and Chrysler.
 
I'm not voting for Trump, but I would wager that his career has resulted in exponentially more public service than Obama's at the time of their respective nominations. And I question Obama's basic understanding of government given some of his early moves, most notably GM and Chrysler.

This is a completely stunning post, even for you.

I honestly have no idea what led you to believe the first sentence or how you think your second sentence holds up logically.
 
I'm not voting for Trump, but I would wager that his career has resulted in exponentially more public service than Obama's at the time of their respective nominations. And I question Obama's basic understanding of government given some of his early moves, most notably GM and Chrysler.
How exactly do you figure that Trumps career "resulted in exponentially more public service than Obama's". Do you consider opening and closing three casinos and being on the Apprentice to be public service?

Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
 
Please explain. How was Obama any more relevantly experienced than Trump? And was it not Obama's strategy to appoint advisers for his inexperienced (read: all) areas? Do you remember the number of "czars" at the beginning? Dude couldn't even open an umbrella without consulting Reggie Love.

He edited the Harvard Law Review and taught constitutional law for over a dozen years and was a State senator for 8 years and a US senator for 4. And he showed some interest and depth in understanding policy and issues and was able to talk about both competently. I know you have this grand desire to try to equate to Caribou Barbie or Trump, but it is just weak sauce.
 
Democrats call everyone who disagrees with them a racist. Nothing new there. It has become a Pavlovian response. They've cried "racism" so often that such baseless claims should simply be ignored. The fact remains, though, that the Clintons are completely corrupt and have shown that they will lie about anything without batting an eye. They corrupt everyone and everything that comes into contact with them. I have no idea what kind of president that Donald Trump would be.....but a President Hillary Clinton is unthinkable.

No, it is your racist comments about black people that make me think you are a racist.
 
Back
Top