ONW
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 19,177
- Reaction score
- 658
Is ELC being in bed with the commies and taking Putin's load the best thing to ever happen to these boards?
EatLoadCommie?
Is ELC being in bed with the commies and taking Putin's load the best thing to ever happen to these boards?
Truth means nothing to me. All that matters is that we won and you lost! LOOOOOSERS! (sticks out tongue) I'm proud to be a Trumpette! GO TEAM AWESOME! #MAGA Whatever the fuck that means! We trumped that bitch! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! HiLIARy probably has blood coming out of her you-know-what!
Trump defenders: If this was the complete opposite situation, Hillary won and the CIA was saying that Russia interfered to her benefit, would you guys be anti-CIA right now?
I would continue to calmly and soberly weigh the evidence for both sides of the issue, something I have not seen from the histrionic Hillshills.
Trump defenders: If this was the complete opposite situation, Hillary won and the CIA was saying that Russia interfered to her benefit, would you guys be anti-CIA right now?
Nice try Comrade. This story is not about Hillary. This is a story about Trump actively trying to cover up Russia's involvement in trying to sway the election in his favor. And then rewarding those who helped them do it.
So say the media is reporting what it is right now, but for Hillary. Would you really be trying to poke holes in the reporting like you are now? From your past conduct, I would have guessed you'd be posting all the Breitbart articles trumpeting the Russian interference. But maybe I'm wrong
BSF was influenced by leaked emails provided by the Russians
BSF is not convinced that Russians tried to influence the election
You don't know who provided the emails to Wikileaks and neither do I. There is disagreement on who is behind it and many people are saying the evidence is not conclusive.
BSF4L, which of the following statements can you agree with:
1. Russia-backed hackers are the prime suspect, and most likely perpetrator, of the DNC email hack.
2. Wikileaks' source was almost certainly whoever perpetrated the DNC hack
3. Russia has attempted to meddle in foreign political races before and clearly preferred Trump in this election.
4. Trump has people in his cabinet and inner circle with significant past or present ties to Russia.
It can't be the complete opposite situation because the CIA has become politicized under Obama.Trump defenders: If this was the complete opposite situation, Hillary won and the CIA was saying that Russia interfered to her benefit, would you guys be anti-CIA right now?
You don't know who provided the emails to Wikileaks and neither do I. There is disagreement on who is behind it and many people are saying the evidence is not conclusive.
It can't be the complete opposite situation because the CIA has become politicized under Obama.
Bolton thinks it could be a false flag and his rationale is very compelling. You basically have the same situation with the current revelations about DNC/RNC servers and Hillary's servers. One was deemed not direct Russian involvement, just hackers with possible Russian connections. The intel people said a direct attack by the government would not be detectable. Here you have a hacker with Russian connections..and lots of finger prints....and now it's 180° the other way??? One or the other, and either scenario would have cratered Hillary.
But if the Russians are trying to destabilize the west, what would they now do? Push the idea they were hacking to get Trump elected.