• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

If Trump ends/cuts Russian sanctions should he be impeached?

Should Trump be impeached for cutting or ending sanctions against Russia?


  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .
Geez RJ; c'mon. No one likes what happened and it should be investigated and a retaliatory "attack" under taken. But like him or not, this isn't on Trump though it is somewhat hysterical that he's putting his head totally in the sand about it. No surprises there though. Life goes on.

In my view the bigger sin is Obama did shit when he first found out about the hacking.
 
Sorry RJ, have appreciated you raising a lot of concerns over the Russian scandal but I don't agree here. It will look ridiculous and I will fight it through every democratic means possible but it's not worthy of impeachment.

If it comes out that Trump or his campaign was somehow involved in the cyberattack then he's fucked and should and will likely be impeached
 
No, I'm confident there will be other impeachable offenses in due time for the modern day Lonesome Rhodes.
 
Geez RJ; c'mon. No one likes what happened and it should be investigated and a retaliatory "attack" under taken. But like him or not, this isn't on Trump though it is somewhat hysterical that he's putting his head totally in the sand about it. No surprises there though. Life goes on.

In my view the bigger sin is Obama did shit when he first found out about the hacking.

If he just buries his head in the sand, there's nothing to talk about. However if he gives Putin the EXXON/Mobil deal and other 100s of billions, it will encourage Putin to do more.

Obama should have acted. He should take out several of Assad's air force bases for this and what is going on in Aleppo. I would imagine cruise missiles from the Mediterranean should be able to do that.
 
If he just buries his head in the sand, there's nothing to talk about. However if he gives Putin the EXXON/Mobil deal and other 100s of billions, it will encourage Putin to do more.

Obama should have acted. He should take out several of Assad's air force bases for this and what is going on in Aleppo. I would imagine cruise missiles from the Mediterranean should be able to do that.

Obama should start World War III as a final FU on the way out. That would be the worlds greatest butt hurt ever over losing an election.

Sound thinking RJ.
 
I'm shocked by your vote birdman. You seemed to be one of the more sensible, less hawkish Trump haters.
 
It's ironic that liberals are now attacking Russia. Have the majority ever been against that region before now? Maybe there was criticism after the Communist era endedin the early '90s, maybe. Recently, I remember reading an article about Jay Carney that had pictures of Soviet propaganda posters on the walls of his place. Also the Russian reset button, the '80s called and wanted Mitt Romney's foreign policy back, etc.

Nonetheless, have they released any evidence that it was the Russians? Right now I don't think the government has the credibility to say "trust us, it was the Russians." Protect sources and whatever else and come out with the evidence. In my opinion, this is a rare instance where burning sources is justified.
 
I'm shocked by your vote birdman. You seemed to be one of the more sensible, less hawkish Trump haters.

Oh, no, I want him out before he even starts. I was pro-recount on the extremely slim chance it would flip the results, I am all for the EC going rogue and risking a civil war. I am very worried about what Trump's environmental policies will do to my birds and other wildlife. I'd impeach him over anything and everything to protect birds.
 
What a load of shit. Liberals never supported Russia. But Trump and 37% of Republicans do now.

To Rwers, it's OK for a foreign government to help pick a POTUS.

Republicans and Dems have seen the intel and have called for hearings.

How the fuck can you "protect the sources" show the intel? By definition showing how and why we determined the source of the hacks HAS to show how we found the sources. Thus weakens our cyber defense.

Even your hero Comey says it's the Russians. EVERY US intel agency agrees.

but keep supporting and apologizing for the Russian dictator.
 
Everyone is being hyper partisan. To deny Russia was an adversary and nothing to worry about then flip to them being the number one threat is RJ being a partisan shill. To flip that and say that Russia was the number one threat and now now not that big of a deal and we should work with them is being a partisan shill. That's what happens when you join a team, Russia hasn't changed one bit but the shilling has.
 
Everyone is being hyper partisan. To deny Russia was an adversary and nothing to worry about then flip to them being the number one threat is RJ being a partisan shill. To flip that and say that Russia was the number one threat and now now not that big of a deal and we should work with them is being a partisan shill. That's what happens when you join a team, Russia hasn't changed one bit but the shilling has.

Your problem is that you appear to be confusing Russia with the Soviet Union.
 
Everyone is being hyper partisan. To deny Russia was an adversary and nothing to worry about then flip to them being the number one threat is RJ being a partisan shill. To flip that and say that Russia was the number one threat and now now not that big of a deal and we should work with them is being a partisan shill. That's what happens when you join a team, Russia hasn't changed one bit but the shilling has.

Show me where I said Russia wasn't an adversary. My bad, you cna just say anything and then RJ.
 
Obama should start World War III as a final FU on the way out. That would be the worlds greatest butt hurt ever over losing an election.

Sound thinking RJ.

Nah, that would be the NC Republican Party (since it's actually happening). #thoughtsandprayers #knowyourparty
 
Last edited:
rj, I thought Clinton was great and W was terrible. Comey is not my hero. I'm no right-winger just because I disagree with you. I wasn't with her or him. I just put true facts in my post, including that the current administration viewed Russia favorably or the reset would never have happened.

Never heard of John Reed and the Communist Labor Party of America, Socialist Party of America, etc. They're facts, but you've gotten along well enough not having to address them for so long that, at some point, they no longer mattered to you.

And I would think that, having known about the hacks since well before the election, the geniuses in charge could come up with a way to protect sources before some eleventh-hour announcement to thumb the scale on the election. I'm just a guy that wants to see evidence before I determine guilt; you obviously don't.

Also, I don't understand why Putin wanted Trump to win. HRC seemed much less difficult to deal with and interventionalist than Trump. I guess I'll be awaiting you're ridiculously over the top conspiracy theory with Tillerson.
 
Last edited:
Also, I don't understand why Putin wanted Trump to win. HRC seemed much less difficult to deal with and interventionalist than Trump.

You had me until this point. You really don't understand? Nothing done during Clinton's tenure as SOS might have rubbed him the wrong way? Nothing? Eh?
 
See that's what you call bait, see Russia at one time wasn't the big bad player RJ makes them out to be now. However he was very concerned about China and even jihadism!!!

No he's not. Russia is not a threat to the US, Europe or Asia. Even with crazy Putin they aren't close to being the threat jihadism is. They aren't a threat to our economy like China is.
 
Back
Top