ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
Why would they record the killing? Too risky.
gotta get those likes & subscriptions
Why would they record the killing? Too risky.
Like 3-4 months ago he said he was taking a break (I think?) but hasn’t returned. Dunno exactly, but he was/is definitely one of my favorite posters, he really knew how to cut through the bullshit, and was hilarious to boot. R.I.P. WnB? Hope not
Jared Kushner like Stephen Miller is one of those guys that make your skin crawl just but looking at him.
RJ Sentence
I would imagine being boys with MBS would be p sweet
Time’s “Person of the Year” is journalists who have been targeted for their work
http://time.com/5475489/behind-the-person-of-the-year-2018-covers/
...Then came Donald Trump, echoing in his inaugural address his predecessors’ use of the city set on a hill image: “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example. We will shine for everyone to follow.”
But it was clear from the beginning that in the Trump administration, American exceptionalism would be about business first and foremost. The city set on a hill would be stripped of its moral component.
In his statement regarding the assassination and mutilation of Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi citizen, resident of the United States, and Washington Post writer, Trump acknowledged that the brutal murder was “terrible,” “an unacceptable and horrible crime.” You could hear the “but” coming a mile away.
But the Saudi government has “agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States. ... It will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, tremendous economic development, and much additional wealth for the United States.”
In a follow-up tweet Trump said: “Oil prices getting lower. Great! Like a big Tax Cut for America and the World. Enjoy! $54, was just $82. Thank you to Saudi Arabia, but let’s go lower!”
It was as if he were saying, If they want to murder a journalist who has been a thorn in their side, well, that’s too bad, but we can’t let a little thing like that get in the way of business. After all, “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone.”
Response was quick and blunt, as Republicans and Democrats tried to reconnect American exceptionalism to a moral base.
Conservative columnist Gary Abernathy said, “No amount of lost deals, even ones worth billions of dollars; no danger of escalating oil prices; no worries of strategic alliances can outweigh the responsibility of the president of the United States to stand tall for a free press and freedom of speech everywhere.” Abernathy could have added: “... and stand against politically motivated assassinations everywhere.”
Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich) said, “No amount of money justifies the betrayal of our principles and values as Americans.”
Recognizing that balancing national interest and moral principles is a delicate and imprecise dance, Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said, “I fully realize we have to deal with bad actors and imperfect situations on the international stage.” Then he added, “However, when we lose our moral voice, we lose our strongest asset.”
Since we are co-opting Jesus: “What does it profit a nation if it gains the whole world but loses its own soul?”
The Senate voted along bipartisan lines Thursday to end U.S. military support for Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen. The 56-41 vote marks the first time the Senate utilized powers granted under the 1973 War Powers Act, which gives Congress the power to demand an end to military actions.
While the House likely won't vote on the measure, the bipartisan vote is a major rebuke to Saudi Arabia, long a key U.S. ally.