BarcaDeac
Well-known member
The NFL and NFLPA are saying, not essentially, that "his selection for testing was normal when compared with the number of tests players were randomly selected for throughout the league during the time that he was on an active roster."
So, either 1) he wasn't tested as many times as he claims (which an unidentified source is saying is the case) or 2) the 6 times he was tested was is "comparable" to the number of times other players were randomly selected. If the case is No. 1, then Reid lied about the number of times he was tested. If the case is No. 2, then the statistician is wrong and the number of times wasn't statistically improbable.
If you believe the NFL/NFLPA joint investigation (the NFLPA being involved makes it very believable), then you have to believe that either Reid isn't telling the truth or that the number of times is normal and not statistically improbable.
I think the NFL should be more transparent about the testing process and reporting out who is tested. The statistician article is from when Reid made his initial claim, based upon data that Reid stated said it would be improbably. The NFL says their algorithm makes it so other players are tested the same amount. We will go on their word, but it's not like the NFL has never bungled investigations before.