Or maybe male only clubs are something we should be moving away from as society progresses. I am sure it's fun to party and circle jerk your bro's, but in 2017 lets be inclusive of everybody.
maybe we have a child psychologist out there who can explain some value in single sex clubs/activities for developing kids;
culturally it made sense in the early -mid 20th century to have two separate scout groups. I don't see how that model fits in 21st century america
For those making snarky comments of "who cares?" or "who gives a shit?", I happen to care a great deal about this.
I was a Cub Scout leader for 8 years (I have two sons) and my younger son is now a Boy Scout. In my mind, this is an incredibly ill-advised move that will strongly contribute to the demise of what is truly an incredible program for imparting character and life skills to boys and youth. It is an unabashed effort to increase membership by poaching from another demographic that is already well served by its own Scouting program, without considering the negative effect this momentous change will have on the core essence of its being. I predict that whatever membership might be gained by this total abandonment of tradition and identity will be more than offset by the loss of those who choose to leave, or not to join, Cub Scouts or Boy Scouts because it has strayed so far from its roots.
WFcatamount22: In your criticisms of fraternities and now Boy Scouts, I've noticed that you like to make dumb statements about groups and organizations to which you have never belonged and about which I suspect you know little. I think you are projecting. In any event, you come off like a dick.
Holy fuck ur ghay
Did you notice in the article where it said the dens would be separate? I don't think it's a huge deal to have dens of girls in the cub scouts program. Little kids are little kids.
Ignore catamount.
For those making snarky comments of "who cares?" or "who gives a shit?", I happen to care a great deal about this.
I was a Cub Scout leader for 8 years (I have two sons) and my younger son is now a Boy Scout. In my mind, this is an incredibly ill-advised move that will strongly contribute to the demise of what is truly an incredible program for imparting character and life skills to boys and youth. It is an unabashed effort to increase membership by poaching from another demographic that is already well served by its own Scouting program, without considering the negative effect this momentous change will have on the core essence of its being. I predict that whatever membership might be gained by this total abandonment of tradition and identity will be more than offset by the loss of those who choose to leave, or not to join, Cub Scouts or Boy Scouts because it has strayed so far from its roots.
WFcatamount22: In your criticisms of fraternities and now Boy Scouts, I've noticed that you like to make dumb statements about groups and organizations to which you have never belonged and about which I suspect you know little. I think you are projecting. In any event, you come off like a dick.
Yeah thanks I'm familiar, I did the whole run from tiger to eagle. I feel like the way dens are structured in Cub Scout packs as more independent units makes it not a huge deal to add another den of girls who just want to participate in the Cub Scout program instead of brownies.
So couldn't the Girl Scouts do things that the Boy Scouts do now? If girls want to be involved in camping, hiking, using knives, tying knots, etc., couldn't the Girl Scouts institute those kinds of programs? Seems like the Girl Scout program stands to lose in this deal by losing participants.
For those making snarky comments of "who cares?" or "who gives a shit?", I happen to care a great deal about this.
I was a Cub Scout leader for 8 years (I have two sons) and my younger son is now a Boy Scout. In my mind, this is an incredibly ill-advised move that will strongly contribute to the demise of what is truly an incredible program for imparting character and life skills to boys and youth. It is an unabashed effort to increase membership by poaching from another demographic that is already well served by its own Scouting program, without considering the negative effect this momentous change will have on the core essence of its being. I predict that whatever membership might be gained by this total abandonment of tradition and identity will be more than offset by the loss of those who choose to leave, or not to join, Cub Scouts or Boy Scouts because it has strayed so far from its roots.
WFcatamount22: In your criticisms of fraternities and now Boy Scouts, I've noticed that you like to make dumb statements about groups and organizations to which you have never belonged and about which I suspect you know little. I think you are projecting. In any event, you come off like a dick.
Feminazis will probably sue to have the cooking merit badge removed.
Bread on a stick. Lol.
First I already said I was just talking about Cub scouts.
Second yeah sure I guess Girl Scouts could do that stuff. Some probably already do. The way Girl Scouts is organized is totally different than the Cub Scout/Boy Scout organization. They are not mirrors of each other with equivalent programs that eventually diverge into camping/knives on one side and cooking/cleaning on the other. I'd get out of my element fast in trying to explain how Girl Scouts is different, but it is and I have to get back to work.
What's the actual detriment to this? How are the Boy Scouts made worse by allowing girls?
well what do you think will happen if a girl and a boy end up having lunch together on one of the camping tripsvery well informed opinions here i see