• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Did Trump insult widow of Niger GI?

WH doubling down. Shocker.

DMmIKg2XkAEL0Ip.jpg:large
 
So the one part of Kelly's spiel that we can actually independently verify isn't even close to accurate, but for the rest we should obviously believe him and not the cowboy hat bling wearing uppity congresswomen from Florida?
 
So the one part of Kelly's spiel that we can actually independently verify isn't even close to accurate, but for the rest we should obviously believe him and not the cowboy hat bling wearing uppity congresswomen from Florida?

"a man of honor and dignity"
 
Oh for god’s sake

If they won't believe an audio tape (or a video tape, in the case of Chris), what's the point? We've entered the post-evidence phase of the Syndrome. Sure, you might have video tape, but do you have the subjective impressions of a glam rock lookalike contest loser who confirms your biases?
 
If they won't believe an audio tape (or a video tape, in the case of Chris), what's the point? We've entered the post-evidence phase of the Syndrome. Sure, you might have video tape, but do you have the subjective impressions of a glam rock lookalike contest loser who confirms your biases?

So you are saying a videotape can confirm whether someone is lying? Interesting.
 
So now we are attacking a Gold Star general?

Awesome
 
Last edited:
So you are saying a videotape can confirm whether someone is lying? Interesting.

Only if it is directly unrelated to the issue at hand and is interpreted with JHMD's politically biased conjecture. If it is direct evidence that somebody JHMD supports, then it will be ignored and responded to with some snarky response.
 
I don’t think we are giving shitbag Donald enough credit for having to call a black woman about her husband who died in Niger. He could have screwed up much worse than he did. We should treat this like a debate performance, and pat his little head for not vomiting on the line.
 
Only if it is directly unrelated to the issue at hand and is interpreted with JHMD's politically biased conjecture. If it is direct evidence that somebody JHMD supports, then it will be ignored and responded to with some snarky response.

It's funny. Hillary Clinton told the Smith and Woods families the same fabricated story that Susan Rice did. Now it wasn't the story she told her own daughter and a foreign diplomat (both of which occurred before she lied to the Smith and Woods families, interestingly enough).

Chris believes that the Smith and Woods families are either both lying or they made the same mistake independently.

Keep in mind, there actually are real, no-kidding emails talking about the need to advance the video tape narrative.

And then Hillary herself says the same lie on a tape.

But Chris doesn't believe she did. Because Hillary.
 
There is a tape and transcript of the speech Wilson gave that Kelly is referencing. Just listen or read it and then read what Kelly said.
 
Sure you can. Just clarify your priorities. If you value your investments which are doing great, just say that. If you value your conservative agenda being advanced at all costs, just say that.

disagree, if your priority is being a decent human being

I recognize there are many non-decent human beings
 
So now we are attacking a Gold Star general?

Awesome

get off your self appointed pedestal moon.

you condone and inflame it coming from the right but reject it as "gasp, how could you" when it comes from the left.


in the words of a great musician..."So put a quarter in your ass 'cause you played yourself "
 
Even if for argument's sake they spun the story, it still pales in comparison to what the adminstration before them lied about and what this adminstration has lied about.

As for the direct evidence that Kelly wasn't telling the truth, probably ignoring it is your best bet here.
 
Even if for argument's sake they spun the story, it still pales in comparison to what the adminstration before them lied about and what this adminstration has lied about.

As for the direct evidence that Kelly wasn't telling the truth, probably ignoring it is your best bet here.

Whataboutism, then?
 
Back
Top