liveanddiedeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2011
- Messages
- 21,494
- Reaction score
- 3,022
He did come up through the college ranks. We can't just invalidate any successful player from being a college coach.
I do agree with your central points. I'll add that NBA teams are so terrified of the offensive skill and athleticism of the opposing team that it's generally more important for guards to get back on D than crash the offensive boards.
The shot clock is a factor too. The NBA guarantees a lot of possessions. 48 min game with a 24 sec shot clock is a baseline of 60 possessions per team. College ball is 40. Each possession is extremely valuable. Hit the boards to make them count.
Obviously not, but sometimes I wonder if a successful player might have a harder time trying to teach and coach lesser talent. Manning had extreme talent as a player, but does that dispose him to not understanding how much coaching/teaching less talented players need? I'm not saying Danny didn't work his ass off coming up as a player, but I would imagine a lot of it came naturally to him. I don't know, I wish like all get out that Danny is successful here. We couldn't have a much better face of the program if he does succeed long term, but I'm just not seeing growth as a coach and I'm afraid the progress of John Collins may not have been as much from Danny's coaching as we thought.