WFU Lurker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 2,621
- Reaction score
- 184
True, but going back to a common debate on this thread is it talent or coaching that is most important and leads to on the court success?
Also, going back to the 2014 UCONN roster that won it all (on that road to the Natty, UCONN beat very talented Villanova, Michigan State, Florida and Kentucky teams and check out the coaches that Ollie beat in a row to take the title: Jay Wright, Fred Hoiberg, Tom Izzo, Billy Donovan and Jon Calapari - no flukes in that win streak), it's not like that 2014 UCONN team was loaded with future NBA talent. Shabazz Napier has been a fringe NBA player for the last 3 years, and there's not another player on the 2014 UCONN roster that has sniffed the NBA. Unless coaching is complete luck, Ollie had to have some kind of clue to get to the top of college basketball 4 years ago. Maybe, he isn't willing to put in the time to recruit since then, but Ollie knew what he was doing in 2014.
I am just not sure your argument. If they were doing well in conference but didn't have national success then you could blame that on conference re-alignment, and it being harder to recruit in the Big East vs American. But, they aren't doing well in conference at all. Cincinatti, which went through the same transition at the same time while its cross-town rival also gained a national profile, has finished ahead of them in conference every single year. SMU has finished ahead of them 3 out of 4 years (tied them the other year). They have far and away the most basketball history in the conference yet SMU has surpassed them as a program. SMU!
2014 suggests he is a good coach when given an experienced roster of players. Every year since suggests he is not good at building a competitive roster on his own.
Last edited: