• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Republican War on the Poor

Trump lost the Socialist Republic of California by more than 4 million votes. The problem there is that we have no way of knowing how many of those votes came from non-citizens who should not have been voting, as California is making no effort to prevent non-citizens from voting. California Democrats aren't giving them all of those free benefits because they don't want them to vote. That's one of the big problems with using the popular vote as a meaningful indicator. When you decide to support a citizenship question on the census we can resume talking about the popular vote.

Also, Trump lost by huge margins in Chicago, New York City, Detroit, Philadelphia & Cleveland, etc. In other words, a plurality of about 90% of the country supported Trump. His popular vote deficit was a result of getting blown out in the other 10% of the country.

LOL. So the only "Real Americans" whose votes should count live in rural/small city red places like Randleman. I hate to tell you this, but most Americans now live in urban areas, and their votes are just as good as yours, no matter what you believe. Tell me, are you also in favor of only allowing property owners to vote? Because your mindset really seems to be going in that direction.
 
LOL. So the only "Real Americans" whose votes should count live in rural/small city red places like Randleman. I hate to tell you this, but most Americans now live in urban areas, and their votes are just as good as yours, no matter what you believe. Tell me, are you also in favor of only allowing property owners to vote? Because your mindset really seems to be going in that direction.

If I was a Board Lib I might call that a "false equivilency" or "whataboutism"....two meaningless terms that they love to throw around. Certainly, all votes should count....all legal votes, anyway. I noticed that you didn't touch that one. Are you naïve enough to think that California Democrats....and Democratic Presidential Candidates....want to give all kind of free benefits to non-citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts? The Democrats view these illegal caravans of people pouring across our southern border as "voter registration" drives to replace American votes that they have been losing by the millions. There is an excellent probability that Trump's margin of victory came from voters who had voted for Obama four years earlier. However, if you are truly wanting to measure the support of the country as a whole....which you obviously are not....you must consider the margins involved with voter groups. Also, Trump's support did not come from only "small, rural places". And, on the other hand, his opponents came mostly from the Left Coast and extremely large cities.
 
Sounds like the OGBoards username approval process is as lax as the alleged California voter registration process
 
Trump lost the Socialist Republic of California by more than 4 million votes. The problem there is that we have no way of knowing how many of those votes came from non-citizens who should not have been voting, as California is making no effort to prevent non-citizens from voting. California Democrats aren't giving them all of those free benefits because they don't want them to vote. That's one of the big problems with using the popular vote as a meaningful indicator. When you decide to support a citizenship question on the census we can resume talking about the popular vote.

Also, Trump lost by huge margins in Chicago, New York City, Detroit, Philadelphia & Cleveland, etc. In other words, a majority of about 90% of the country supported Trump. His popular vote deficit was a result of getting blown out in the other 10% of the country.


(And I'm sure that EflandDeac will be banned shortly. The Liberal Powers-That-Be who run this circle jerk do not want to see their baloney grinded.)

Trump should create some sort of voter fraud commission to investigate illegal voting!
 
If I was a Board Lib I might call that a "false equivilency" or "whataboutism"....two meaningless terms that they love to throw around. Certainly, all votes should count....all legal votes, anyway. I noticed that you didn't touch that one. Are you naïve enough to think that California Democrats....and Democratic Presidential Candidates....want to give all kind of free benefits to non-citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts? The Democrats view these illegal caravans of people pouring across our southern border as "voter registration" drives to replace American votes that they have been losing by the millions. There is an excellent probability that Trump's margin of victory came from voters who had voted for Obama four years earlier. However, if you are truly wanting to measure the support of the country as a whole....which you obviously are not....you must consider the margins involved with voter groups. Also, Trump's support did not come from only "small, rural places". And, on the other hand, his opponents came mostly from the Left Coast and extremely large cities.

I didn't touch it because it's a dumb argument. You got any proof of massive "illegal voting" by all of those "non-citizens"? You do know that the GOP stole a House election right here in NC - the one where there's a redo going on just this month? It doesn't matter where Trump or Hillary's support came from, all votes count equally, dude. You are arguing that red-state votes should count more than blue-state ones, and that's just not how it works. Cry Socialist or "benefits" or "non-citizen" votes all you want, unless you've got evidence of massive vote fraud there's nothing to your claims. I know it pains you, but your hero lost the national popular vote - that is, the votes of all Americans - by three million. He doesn't represent more than an angry, embittered, and very vocal minority of people. Like you.
 
Trump lost the Socialist Republic of California by more than 4 million votes. The problem there is that we have no way of knowing how many of those votes came from non-citizens who should not have been voting, as California is making no effort to prevent non-citizens from voting. California Democrats aren't giving them all of those free benefits because they don't want them to vote. That's one of the big problems with using the popular vote as a meaningful indicator. When you decide to support a citizenship question on the census we can resume talking about the popular vote.

Also, Trump lost by huge margins in Chicago, New York City, Detroit, Philadelphia & Cleveland, etc. In other words, a majority of about 90% of the country supported Trump. His popular vote deficit was a result of getting blown out in the other 10% of the country.


(And I'm sure that EflandDeac will be banned shortly. The Liberal Powers-That-Be who run this circle jerk do not want to see their baloney grinded.)

You made the bet.

Typical GOP victimhood complex. This guy makes a bad bet and can’t hold himself to it so he blames the people in charge who do.
 
You made the bet.

Typical GOP victimhood complex. This guy makes a bad bet and can’t hold himself to it so he blames the people in charge who do.

LOL. You a good one to talk about "victimhood". You play that game 24/7. The simple fact is that Liberals (like you) do not want free speech. You only want affirmation of your own positions....which is why liberals love the circle jerk Tunnels. All the grandiose claims like "Discuss Freely" (listed in the title above) are a lie. Where is jhmd? Where is lectro? You find a way to systematically weed out opposing positions so that all you have left is a liberal circle jerk. It is the same way on our college campuses. You have a bunch of college professors (like you) who have been out of the real world for so long that they are clueless. And they are no longer teaching students, they are indoctrinating them. Most institutions...and Wake Forest is certainly at the forefront....have become overpriced cesspools of liberal indoctrination. They are not the least bit interested in "free speech".
 
Bob's very weak mentally and is mostly occupied with bitterness and resentment. How else does somebody go from hardcore reactionary idiot socialist to hardcore reactionary Trump supporter?
 
Seems like he just goes to where the most hardcore reactionaries are. The right has been dominant in that area.
 
Last edited:
LOL. You a good one to talk about "victimhood". You play that game 24/7. The simple fact is that Liberals (like you) do not want free speech. You only want affirmation of your own positions....which is why liberals love the circle jerk Tunnels. All the grandiose claims like "Discuss Freely" (listed in the title above) are a lie. Where is jhmd? Where is lectro? You find a way to systematically weed out opposing positions so that all you have left is a liberal circle jerk. It is the same way on our college campuses. You have a bunch of college professors (like you) who have been out of the real world for so long that they are clueless. And they are no longer teaching students, they are indoctrinating them. Most institutions...and Wake Forest is certainly at the forefront....have become overpriced cesspools of liberal indoctrination. They are not the least bit interested in "free speech".

You self-banned based on losing a bet fucknuts. You wouldn't be banned had you not made that bet and lost it.

Jhmd isn't banned. He took a self imposed absence related to his work.

Lectro earned the ban hammer 10 times over.
 
Neither jhmd nor especially Lectro engaged in free speech. Each posted lies and totally BS "experts" like Linzen, who had lied to Congress previously about cigarettes not being addictive.

Efland is going down that same road with posts like this"

"Are you naïve enough to think that California Democrats....and Democratic Presidential Candidates....want to give all kind of free benefits to non-citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts? The Democrats view these illegal caravans of people pouring across our southern border as "voter registration" drives to replace American votes that they have been losing by the millions."

This is a totally false RW boogeyman lie. First of all, anyone in America can go to the ER for health service as it is. Next, the "caravans" (another Trump/RW lie) were completely LEGAL. They were going to the border to turn themselves in and go through the LEGAL asylum process as millions of people had done in the past.

It is laughable, dishonest and an outright LIE to to allege people coming from Central America were a "voter registration" drive. Only brainwashed, ignorant fools who don't know anything other what is spoon-fed to them by Trump's racist cabal would ever think this is possible. It's a disgraceful and easily disproven lie. But you support it.

Posts like yours are not about "free speech". Spewing abject, fear mongering, unadulterated LIES are not worthy of respect or to be treated as justifiable.
 
If I was a Board Lib I might call that a "false equivilency" or "whataboutism"....two meaningless terms that they love to throw around. Certainly, all votes should count....all legal votes, anyway. I noticed that you didn't touch that one. Are you naïve enough to think that California Democrats....and Democratic Presidential Candidates....want to give all kind of free benefits to non-citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts? The Democrats view these illegal caravans of people pouring across our southern border as "voter registration" drives to replace American votes that they have been losing by the millions. There is an excellent probability that Trump's margin of victory came from voters who had voted for Obama four years earlier. However, if you are truly wanting to measure the support of the country as a whole....which you obviously are not....you must consider the margins involved with voter groups. Also, Trump's support did not come from only "small, rural places". And, on the other hand, his opponents came mostly from the Left Coast and extremely large cities.

Are you really naive enough to think that hundreds-let alone thousands or millions-of people are willing to risk a felony conviction to cast a vote that almost certainly will not swing the election?
 
BKF’s post is an excellent case of feelings over facts, like the faithful Trumper he is. Let’s take a closer look:

1) claims massive voter fraud in California without any evidence and ignores the voter fraud just to his south by republicans in his own state.
2) claims JH and Lectro were run off despite LK’s post. Lectro also got banned for threatening violence and posting white nationalist sites.
3) says people like him can’t discuss politics freely here. Wrong. If you post shitty opinions and claim them as fact (see #1), you get called out for it.
4) like trump, creates a “problem” (I will get banned because this place is a liberal circle jerk !) to play victim. As LK said, you got banned because of a bet of your own making.
5) rails on liberals for giving out “free benefits” without a hint of irony his job was given to him by his FIL. Lol.

The facts are, people like BKF are so insecure in their beliefs they lash out at liberals for their problems instead of looking within. So brave.
 
Are you really naive enough to think that hundreds-let alone thousands or millions-of people are willing to risk a felony conviction to cast a vote that almost certainly will not swing the election?

I guess Efland thinks that if all the millions of "non-citizen" voters in California were uncovered and prevented from voting, then California might join the rest of "Real America" and vote for Trump too. The only way LibDems ever win is through cheating, you know.
 
I love the idea of Wake Forest as a bastion of liberalism. Sean Hannity’s kid goes to school at Wake. The Koch Brothers fund a capitalism program through the business school.
 
Clearly Hannity sent his kid to Wake to troll the libs.
 
Bob's very weak mentally and is mostly occupied with bitterness and resentment. How else does somebody go from hardcore reactionary idiot socialist to hardcore reactionary Trump supporter?

What do you mean? They’re virtually the same thing .
 
Back
Top