• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Trump White House's Mishandling of Classified Material

You haven’t posted your views.

He only posts his views about stories he has been following closely. It’s pretty obvious that sailor has a preference for conservative media outlets based on his conservapedia research, so the stories he does or doesn’t follow are a pretty good lens into the coverage of those sources. Therefore, anything that doesn’t favor trump isn’t even a reality in his news world. It’s kind of fascinating.
 
"I haven't followed that story closely" is the closest a trump shill will come to criticizing the clown in chief . It's a ridiculous cop out. The very fact that people post on this board means that yes they do follow theses things closely and to claim otherwise when facts don't fit your worldview is pathetic.
 
haven't followed either story particularly closely

I don't support hitting women under any circumstances by anybody

people working in the WH need security clearances ASAP, who ever is responsible for security clearances needs to get busy immediately

Have you considered that maybe the White House should try to hire people that can pass a standard background check?
 
Have you considered that maybe the White House should try to hire people that can pass a standard background check?

ekwwX8w.jpg
 
Have you considered that maybe the White House should try to hire people that can pass a standard background check?

well that is a novel idea. hire good, qualified people...not under Trump's reign for sure.
 
haven't followed either story particularly closely

I don't support hitting women under any circumstances by anybody

people working in the WH need security clearances ASAP, who ever is responsible for security clearances needs to get busy immediately

So get busy handing out security clearances for those at risk of being compromised?
 
Oh, it’s a problem for “conservatives” for a while now.

They really shine when not in power. Their expertise is in taking intellectually vacuous pot shots at “libruls” trying to do something good. The essence of their argument is “less” government, taxes, or regulations is the answer to almost all problems, no matter how complex. Exceptions for pet concerns (protection for religious “liberty” to discriminate and oppress, etc.).

They have one other tool to oppose progress—pretending to be against debt. Of course that’s now plainly mere deceptive posturing.

When in power they simply flounder about doing irresponsible and harmful and dumb shit—lowering taxes at exactly the wrong time and in ways that benefit the wrong people, etc.

And since they actually possess no decent or defensible agenda, they simply try to keep throwing criticism at boogeymen largely of their own creation and fervent imaginations.
 
So it looks like McGahn and others at the White House likely knew of Porter's abuse 1 week after inauguration.

You literally have a man (Porter) who is a prime target for blackmail handling all of our nation's most important secrets for the entire Trump presidency.

 
And then there's this bullshit from another person who is a prime target for blackmail.

Anyone care to explain or defend Porter and Kushner's unfettered access to our country's most highly guarded secrets?

 
And then there's this bullshit from another person who is a prime target for blackmail.

Anyone care to explain or defend Porter and Kushner's unfettered access to our country's most highly guarded secrets?


Kushner is the stereotypical example of the rich white kid that wanted for nothing and never had to work a day in his life being elevated undeservedly to a position of power, but that position not being enough for him due to his being used to getting everything he wants. And when he is told no, he complains to daddy or, in this case, daddy-in-law who gives him what he wants. But it still isn't enough, so he asks for more and more. You'd be hard pressed to find a more blatant and dangerous version of nepotism in American history.
 
GOP strategists, sipping brandy] So these investigations are starting to become a problem, we need to do something. Easy, we just discredit the FBI, say they are a bunch of democrats against Trump. But the FBI is run by Republicans, some of which we appointed, and they just helped throw the election for us?
Doesn't matter, we can just say the opposite of that. We have the rubes.
*glasses clink*
 
No need to discredit the lawyers atop the FBI..they are doing quite a number on themselves..

Now Dems truly need to pull out all diversionary stops at this point ...

Hence they are busy baking Nada Muffins
 
Last edited:
At the time, The Washington Times reported that more than 500 of the 1,000 background checks of Clinton personnel “would have prevented the people [involved] from obtaining security clearances at the FBI, Defense Department or CIA.”
 
GOP strategists, sipping brandy] So these investigations are starting to become a problem, we need to do something. Easy, we just discredit the FBI, say they are a bunch of democrats against Trump. But the FBI is run by Republicans, some of which we appointed, and they just helped throw the election for us?
Doesn't matter, we can just say the opposite of that. We have the rubes.
*glasses clink*

the administrative swamp creatures are mostly dems but not exclusively, if that confuses you, sad

some people don't start out as swamp creatures but after living in the swamp they turn and become swamp creatures, if you can't grasp that, you are intellectually limited and lack imagination
 
At the time, The Washington Times reported that more than 500 of the 1,000 background checks of Clinton personnel “would have prevented the people [involved] from obtaining security clearances at the FBI, Defense Department or CIA.”

Wow. That’s bad news for the Hillary administration.
 
the administrative swamp creatures are mostly dems but not exclusively, if that confuses you, sad

some people don't start out as swamp creatures but after living in the swamp they turn and become swamp creatures, if you can't grasp that, you are intellectually limited and lack imagination

*glasses clink*
 
the administrative swamp creatures are mostly dems but not exclusively, if that confuses you, sad

some people don't start out as swamp creatures but after living in the swamp they turn and become swamp creatures, if you can't grasp that, you are intellectually limited and lack imagination

I waded waist deep in the swamp for the better part of my career.

You have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
 
Back
Top