ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
And as predicted, this conversation is now about meaningless stats
Somewhere elkman smiles
Somewhere elkman smiles
And as predicted, this conversation is now about meaningless stats
Somewhere elkman smiles
A good way to avoid that would be for people to stop avoiding discussions of school shootings.
the discussion should have the truth at its foundation
why would there be a reason to lie about the number of and severity of shootings? one kid killing 17 people should be enough to launch an honest conversation
the discussion should have the truth at its foundation
why would there be a reason to lie about the number of and severity of shootings? one kid killing 17 people should be enough to launch an honest conversation
That's what's so infuriating. Our representatives aren't representing us at all.
Or just ignore the post and move on. The statement about numbers of shootings had little to nothing to do with the actual discussion
So now that we’ve beat that horse to deaeth and then some let’s move on and talk about potential solutions.
We were having an honest conversation. You are distracting us from it.
the discussion should have the truth at its foundation
why would there be a reason to lie about the number of and severity of shootings? one kid killing 17 people should be enough to launch an honest conversation
A lie is an intentional attempt to mislead with false materials. I didn't do that. I reported what multiple national press groups reported. Then pulled the word that offended.
But if you makes you feel better about yourself.
talking about 18 mass shootings at schools since January 1 is not an honest conversation
We weren’t talking about that until you distracted us by talking about it.
It's not 20 students injured. It's 18 separate mass shootings at schools since Jan. 1.
It must hurt to be this dense.
Jeez Louise - no its not. Not even close to "18 separate mass shootings at schools" this year. This is why it is dangerous to spout these statistics, people believe them.
Honest question, are you retarded?
in fairness, I ignored it the first several times it was referenced, and the fact that the statistic is being distorted is a major talking point for those seeking to retain the status quo (I'm not one of those people); therefore, it IS important to use facts
that and, it's generally a good idea to use facts
ok
1. ban the AR-15 and other semi-automatic rifles (this of course won't solve the issue of 5 million or so AR-15s currently in the US; but if we do nothing, in a few years we'll have 10 million)
2. failing that, make it impossible for someone under the age of 21 to purchase one
3. failing that, make it impossible for someone expelled from high school to purchase one
and there are many more common-sense solutions, like requiring registration for every gun purchase, requiring training, requiring liability insurance, requiring a safe be purchased to house any gun, holding people responsible for accidental discharges by their children, etc.
talking about 18 mass shootings at schools since January 1 is not an honest conversation
We weren’t talking about that until you distracted us by talking about it.
It's not 20 students injured. It's 18 separate mass shootings at schools since Jan. 1.
It must hurt to be this dense.
Jeez Louise - no its not. Not even close to "18 separate mass shootings at schools" this year. This is why it is dangerous to spout these statistics, people believe them.
You literally just followed up a legitimate post on how to reduce gun violence with a post about misleading stats. How can you claim you’re not derailing the conversation?
Harping on something dumb rjkarl says to distract from a real issue is a tried and true tactic.