This is all correct simultaneously.
If the standard for supporting a coop in another country, forcing a leadership change, etc., is that the current leader is a shit head, why would Venezuela be any different than any other harsh dictatorship. We should probably intervene in Nicaragua, Phillipines, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, N. Korea, Iran...where does such a policy end? We have a long and failed history of intervening in the internal politics of many countries...Iran comes to mind, Nicaragua also and the biggest most recent failure is Iraq. Every one should just pump the breaks on interventionist policies for distastefully dictatorial countries. Trump is wildly incompetent, but plenty of competent international leaders (Reagan,Kennedy, Bush, Obama) completely failed at interventions in the past, so even under the best circumstances its a high risk endeavor. That is not an expression of support for Marudo nor an abdication of power to Russia. It's an expression of caution for over zealous humanitarian intentions that have a tendency to back fire.