Why after all this time does this thread title still refer to “nominees”?
Fits with the political savvy of those posting the most on this thread.
Why after all this time does this thread title still refer to “nominees”?
Brad any response on the gun thread about the actual text of the Obama-era regulation that Donald rolled back?
The President is smarter than Brad. More intellectually curious as well. Make of that what you will.
Brad knows better than to get into any discussion where he has to display depth of knowledge of anything.Sorry about that, counselor. My apologies. If only I lived on these boards 24/7 with 50k posts to my name I likely would not have overlooked.
lol YES can't make it through a public appearance without saying something asinine but should definitely be president
I have read some worthless articles in my day that have told me absolutely nothing... And that was one of them.
lol YES can't make it through a public appearance without saying something asinine but should definitely be president
Brad knows better than to get into any discussion where he has to display depth of knowledge of anything.
I have read some worthless articles in my day that have told me absolutely nothing... And that was one of them.
What do you like about Joe Biden, Chris? Is it just that he will keep your taxes low? Is that the reason that you're willing to doom the country to another four years of sundowning, dementia-laden incompetence?
I think he can win. I think he has coattails that could potentially get the senate and would make actually passing more progressive policy a reality than anything a left-wing base candidate could hope to get accomplished. I think at the end of the day, the reality of what can get accomplished is closer to what Biden wants, so its all about who can win.
That really has nothing to do with that fact that the article was the opinion some anonymous "ally" of Joe Biden who apparently has little sway in the decison making of the campaign. Totally worthless.
Sorry about that, counselor. My apologies. If only I lived on these boards 24/7 with 50k posts to my name I likely would not have overlooked.
You and Jay are simply ignoring the additional part of that regulation dealing with individuals who are deemed mentally incapable of handling their own benefits payments. All you have to do is read the actual language. To say they don’t relate to mental health is belied by the actual language.
If people are held not to be mentally capable of handling this process why in the world would we not want them to be barred from buying firearms? Additionally - as Milhouse points out - it did roll back an Obama era regulation. What is the false part? You’re literally doing what you accuse others of doing in relying on some random DC examiner author’s (wrong) analysis. We all know that you don’t actually know what the regulation is or was anyway.
What do you like about Joe Biden, Chris? Is it just that he will keep your taxes low? Is that the reason that you're willing to doom the country to another four years of sundowning, dementia-laden incompetence?
Gabbard needs three more qualifying polls in the next two weeks (two percent threshold).