What does everyone think about Peter Buttgieg?
For me he checks a lot of the boxes minus experience at the national level. He's engaging, progressive, and very sharp. Been following him for a couple years and was surprised he launched straight to running for president - I anticipated he would run for Senate or governor in Indiana first.
First off,he needs to consult with Warren Wilhelm JR. Something's gotta change.
I’ve never been interested 23 and me stuff. I’m an existentialist. Existence precedes essence.
It is what it is, man. I'm not gonna back down when people wind me up or call me a liar.that’s not how message boards work
Seems you dipshits would someday get a clue and realize that National Review fiscal austerity politics dont appeal to the majority of Americans who don't have any money or savings. You country club middle class whites are literally a dying fanatical fringe, and we crazy socialists are just doing our best to prevent you from being buried with all your gold like hillbilly Pharoahs.Maybe Obama homer Doris Kearns Goodwin will coin a happy con such as “Team of Rivals” — that was some gassing.
An apropos description of this rag-tag and delusional bunch of Democrat pretenders would be something like “The Band of Oz”
Presidential candidates hoping to compete in California are in for an exceedingly expensive project: The state has 8.5 million registered Democrats spread over eight major media markets.
The state’s March 3 primary — with mail ballots going out in February — means candidates won’t be able to rely solely on momentum from Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina to carry them.
Ignore the realities of American economic distribution at your own peril.skip the sermonettes socialists, just take the donkeys over the cliff, and don't be late
Ignore the realities of American economic distribution at your own peril.
it's easy for him to do so while he wastes away in fascist paradise
Yours or my personal economic philosophies aren't relevant. The point i'm making is that the majority of voting age American adults are lower income and have different material conditions that the writers and subscribers of The National Review. Maybe dont take election advice from The New Yorker either.capitalism distributes benefits unequally, socialism distributes misery equally and universally
if you don't understand this, you are a fool
capitalism distributes benefits unequally, socialism distributes misery equally and universally
if you don't understand this, you are a fool
By that logic, wouldn't capitalism also distribute misery unequally?
Most people in our system today aren't miserable, but yes our capitalist model does make a small minority of people somewhat miserable. I think given the alternatives that should be largely acceptable.