Page 11 of 28 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314151621 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 560

Thread: Wes Miller Watch 2018-2019

  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBrasky View Post
    The alumni and the fans are the reason Wellman still has a job. You dumb asses keep giving money to the man.
    “You” my ass. The big money doners control everything. They are the morons.

  2. #202
    Quote Originally Posted by knowell View Post
    I would love to talk about how much we appreciate Danny being a stand up guy for doing the right thing and resigning.
    This

  3. #203
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever RJKarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    65,749
    Quote Originally Posted by Ayo View Post
    Wes Miller talk, Manning vs. Bz arguments. This board has become so stale. We really need something new to talk about.
    If he can't beat them, why would anyone expect him to beat other ACC coaches?

    Wes is also 0fer against ranked teams.

  4. #204
    I would be excited to see what Wes can do with ACC talent.

    Could Nick Saban win against ranked opponents at Guilford College?

  5. #205
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    If he can't beat them, why would anyone expect him to beat other ACC coaches?

    Wes is also 0fer against ranked teams.
    I don't want Wes either. Nate Oats is my guy, but he might get better offers than us this offseason.

  6. #206
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    If he can't beat them, why would anyone expect him to beat other ACC coaches?

    Wes is also 0fer against ranked teams.
    Presumably when you coach for UNCG, you get UNCG talent. When you coach for Wake, you get ACC talent. They were leading at the half. Manning would have been down 30.

    This is not all that complicated, RJ.

  7. #207
    Quote Originally Posted by Ayo View Post
    I don't want Wes either. Nate Oats is my guy, but he might get better offers than us this offseason.
    For me, it does not have to be Wes, but it should be someone with a similar resume.

  8. #208
    Quote Originally Posted by knowell View Post
    Presumably when you coach for UNCG, you get UNCG talent. When you coach for Wake, you get ACC talent. They were leading at the half. Manning would have been down 30.

    This is not all that complicated, RJ.
    That was the point I was making.

  9. #209
    A Young Go-Hard
    myDeaconmyhand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Peters Creek
    Posts
    26,217
    Quote Originally Posted by knowell View Post
    Presumably when you coach for UNCG, you get UNCG talent. When you coach for Wake, you get ACC talent. They were leading at the half. Manning would have been down 30.

    This is not all that complicated, RJ.
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    If he can't beat them, why would anyone expect him to beat other ACC coaches?

    Wes is also 0fer against ranked teams.
    He beat NC State last year and took a ranked LSU to overtime like a week ago. Maybe you werent watching today, but UNCG led in Rupp for 35 minutes. Wes already has Mannings level of talent, and he's coaching it much more effectively.
    Draxx them sklounst

  10. #210
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever RJKarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    65,749
    Quote Originally Posted by knowell View Post
    For me, it does not have to be Wes, but it should be someone with a similar resume.
    Being barely above .500 for eight years?

    Never beating a ranked team?

    Losing to Wake five times during our lost decade?

  11. #211
    Can we please just run our offense through Hoard?

  12. #212
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever RJKarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    65,749
    Quote Originally Posted by myDeaconmyhand View Post
    He beat NC State last year and took a ranked LSU to overtime like a week ago. Maybe you werent watching today, but UNCG led in Rupp for 35 minutes. Wes already has Mannings level of talent, and he's coaching it much more effectively.
    And lost by 17 today....he can't beat Danny or [redacted]....

  13. #213
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    Being barely above .500 for eight years?

    Never beating a ranked team?

    Losing to Wake five times during our lost decade?
    You're a moron. You deserve Danny Manning. The rest of us don't.

  14. #214
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    And lost by 17 today....he can't beat Danny or [redacted]....
    Want to bet on the UNCG game? And Miller won't be coaching any "lottery" pics.

  15. #215
    If we ever do a coach search that only includes chatting with and hiring Wes Miller we are born fools. He may be the best we can get. Maybe not. No one runs a decent enterprise with a laser focus on one possibility.

  16. #216
    Wes Miller has done enough to be a legitimate candidate for the Wake job.

  17. #217
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    Wes Miller has done enough to be a legitimate candidate for the Wake job.
    Right. Who else?

  18. #218
    PM a mod to cement your internet status forever RJKarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    65,749
    At best, Wes should be our fifth choice. His resume is dramatically weaker than Grant's, Kelsey's, Matta's and Musselman's. That's just off the top of my head.

  19. #219
    Quote Originally Posted by RJKarl View Post
    At best, Wes should be our fifth choice. His resume is dramatically weaker than Grant's, Kelsey's, Matta's and Musselman's. That's just off the top of my head.
    Do you honestly think any of those guys would be interested in the Wake job right now? I agree Wake should look at several good candidates, but the job isnt likely to be attractive to a lot of coaches.

  20. #220
    I don’t know who out there is the best coach option for Wake, but I DO know that I don’t want RW making the choice. THAT would be progress.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •