RChildress107
Well-known member
I suppose that'll be significantly easier in March, big guy.
Nah, I don’t know enough about any of you to conclude you are shitty, so it’s pretty easy now.
I suppose that'll be significantly easier in March, big guy.
Nah, I don’t know enough about any of you to conclude you are shitty, so it’s pretty easy now.
I proudly fall into both camps
Reading comprehension, buddy. I was trying to take your advice, and speaking about myself. Maybe we both just have a lack of clarity in the way that we post. I will give you one compliment; you're awful fucking adept at making someone continue a pissing contest well after they know that they should have left it alone. Thread hijack over, with my apologies to the rest of the posters. I said good day!
ITT we learn there is a shrink somewhere stealing $$
You would stick up for the insurance companies.
His team is tied for first after eight games. He is 6th in scoring and 7th in assists while shooting 53% on 2s, 38.7% on 3s and 83.3% on FTs.
http://basket.co.il/stats-individual.asp?cYear=2019&sType=pts&local=0&StatsBoard=0&lang=en
I want to get it, please help?
Manning should be credited/blamed for the talent he brings in, he should be credited/blamed for how his teams perform, and he should be credited/blamed for how players progress under his tutelage. He shouldn�t be blamed for made up claims about the last of those.
Based on his sophomore year, Crawford�s performance in Israel is in line with what you�d expect for a player that continues to progress. Crawford saw a dip in his junior year but wasn�t nearly as bad as this board made him out to be. I�d imagine his struggles were due to a number of factors: progression isn�t always linear, there were obvious chemistry issues between Crawford/BChill/Woods (which are ultimately on Manning), and Crawford has some attitude issues (which were at least somewhat on Manning).
I know nuance is anathema to this board, but I thought we could avoid plainly untrue statements like �the vast majority of players that leave awake are obviously more effective in basketball after they leave.� Crawford is a pretty weak example of that even if you are only comparing this year to last year, I�m not aware of any others, much less a vast majority.
I think Rchills post make the most sense when filled with random characters.
Seriously?
You hilariously implied that my therapist was “stealing” money. Presumably because she was getting paid without delivering results. Ignoring the multiple levels of ignorance in that joke for the time being, whose money do you think my therapist is stealing?
It was just a joke, and if it went too far I apologize. Good luck to you bro and good on you both for seeing a therapist and admitting to it freely. No shame or stigma in that.
Deacon Nation alone could probably keep the industry afloat with what we all collectively endure.
He’s averaging 19 and 5.3 with good percentages. He’s 3rd in the league in VAL, what I assume is an advanced metric. He’s right up there with a former NBA player who is 10 years older than him.
Yet Wake fans mock him because he left our beloved dumpster fire of a program and got paid.
dentist
I was just mocking him because he missed a lot of dunks.
A missed dunk contest with Crawford and Trent Strickland would be fun to watch. They could measure the bounces the same way they do long jumps.