• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Bill Barr: The Cover-Up General

SC DEAC said:
Sounds like Roger Stone had a pathetic defense team who allowed that person to be on the jury instead of striking her in the selection process. In America, people with strong opinions are allowed to be on juries and lawyers who don't appreciate those opinions are allowed to try and keep them from being on the jury. Not hard to understand.
Click to expand...

No. It sounds like a tainted jury and a partial judge.
 
sailordeac said:
No. It sounds like a tainted jury and a partial judge.
Click to expand...

Even Trump hasn't attacked the jury, but you know more.

The judge is well respected by both sides. Only Trump and you are saying negative things about her.
 
sailordeac said:
Tainted juries and partial judges have always been an essential part of y'all's People's Dystopia of Lubish Absurdistan. Without them, the whole lubish project would be unthinkable.
Click to expand...

This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. There is an entire system with jury selection where both sides get to strike potential jurors for any reason at all and then for cause. Either the defense attorneys didn't do their job in rooting out potential bias or they knew about it but struck other jurors for other reasons and viewed donations to a candidate NOT AT ALL INVOLVED IN THE alleged crime as irrelevant.
 
sailor, did you go to Wake? I'm curious, because everything you post is so fucking stupid.
 
SC DEAC said:
Sounds like Roger Stone had a pathetic defense team who allowed that person to be on the jury instead of striking her in the selection process. In America, people with strong opinions are allowed to be on juries and lawyers who don't appreciate those opinions are allowed to try and keep them from being on the jury. Not hard to understand.
Click to expand...

...And this is why we need a law to keep liberals off of juries and out of the prosecutor’s chair.
 
MichDeac25 said:
This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. There is an entire system with jury selection where both sides get to strike potential jurors for any reason at all and then for cause. Either the defense attorneys didn't do their job in rooting out potential bias or they knew about it but struck other jurors for other reasons and viewed donations to a candidate NOT AT ALL INVOLVED IN THE alleged crime as irrelevant.
Click to expand...

Maybe they left her in there so they could coordinate with Fox News later to expose her and overturn the verdict.
 
Bill Barr isn't going to be "bullied," y'all.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bar...job/story?id=68963276&cid=social_twitter_abcn

In an exclusive interview, Attorney General Bill Barr told ABC News on Thursday that President Donald Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case” but should stop tweeting about the Justice Department because his tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job.”
Barr’s comments are a rare break with a president who the attorney general has aligned himself with and fiercely defended. But it also puts Barr in line with many of Trump’s supporters on Capitol Hill who say they support the president but wish he’d cut back on his tweets.
Click to expand...

Yeah right.
 
Barr is whining on an ABC interview. He is being 100% disingenuous. What a scumbag!
 
The Kubuki theater from Barr is tiring. A real Attorney General would have resigned instead of complaining that Trump is shining too much light on his nefarious work.
 
The gop, Barr, and other enablers would like donald to stop tweeting. He just keeps shining a light on their actions that they would prefer go unnoticed in the dark. It does not matter to his supporters of course but it does add fuel to his detractors and points people like Schiff or reporters towards questions to ask and directions to look.
 
birdman said:
This is crazy. We need a law that says only republicans can serve on juries and be prosecutors.
Click to expand...

That's a start but it's not good enough. We need a law that prevents Democrats from serving as judges, providing testimony as witnesses or working in any law enforcement agency city, county, state or federal. The quicker we can root out anyone who has not sworn personal loyalty to the Great Donald Trump out of the military or the intelligence agencies the better as well.
 
WakeForestRanger said:
That's a start but it's not good enough. We need a law that prevents Democrats from serving as judges, providing testimony as witnesses or working in any law enforcement agency city, county, state or federal. The quicker we can root out anyone who has not sworn personal loyalty to the Great Donald Trump out of the military or the intelligence agencies the better as well.
Click to expand...

Picture of sailor reading this post.
 
Of course, he's not upset. This was 100% a ruse to give Barr some cover.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top