DaemonDeac
New member
I’m just glad to have a reason to get excited about Wake Hoops again at what used to be my favorite time of year.
What do you expect him to say? He’s not going to fire him until after the season. The fact that Manning hasn’t been mentioned in any of this stuff today is a clear indication that he isn’t part of the future.
We'll all know soon enough. No need for folks on either side of the debate to get bent out of shape.
What do you expect him to say? He’s not going to fire him until after the season. The fact that Manning hasn’t been mentioned in any of this stuff today is a clear indication that he isn’t part of the future.
If Currie doesn't start until May 1 who is going to fire Manning?
And on the buyout, if anything remotely close to what has been rumored is true, we need a MAJOR overhaul of our AD processes.
I thought the timing of this news was an indicator that more than just an AD coup d'etat was executed behind the scenes, such as lining up a coach already. But that buyout keeps rearing it's ugly head as many keep coming here saying it IS legit. That scares me and, if true, really puts a damper on the excitement surrounding a "fresh start." And then to read this from Currie, in Les' interview:
“I would say that the good Lord gave us two eyes, two ears and one mouth for a reason. It’s time to do a lot of listening, observing and learning,” Currie said when asked about his approach in evaluating the various programs in the athletic department. “There’s a lot of great things going on at Wake Forest. I need to make sure that rule number one is to not mess it up. I’m coming in to get to learn some folks and we’ll continue to chart an aggressive course moving forward.”/QUOTE]
Hopefully this is just normal public-face, AD-speak in these situations as it doesn't necessarily address Manning directly, but it was put in the article right after a mention of the BB program and their prospect of a third 20-loss season in 5 years. This gives me great pause and my excitement for already having a home-run hire (a la Matta) has really been diminished now.
Please, someone give me more hope. This buyout CAN'T BE TRUE!?? CAN IT?
Seems the opposite to me. It seems the timing is made exactly to let the coaches know the job will be available and that there will be a new AD. If a coach was already lined up, why the need to do it before the end of the season?
What do you expect him to say? He’s not going to fire him until after the season. The fact that Manning hasn’t been mentioned in any of this stuff today is a clear indication that he isn’t part of the future.
The Big 10 wanted UVA (to pair with MD) and UNC/Duke for many reasons (including the Big 10 Academic Alliance). Those schools were interested because the Big 10 money was real (see Maryland’s $50 million buyout).
As the article clearly states, it was an on and off rumor for months. There had been some degree of speculation for years because of the dire financial situation that Maryland athletics was in and the Big 10’s stated interest in expansion.
Ph, just last week you suggested it would take months, or longer, for us to hire a new AD. Please understand my skepticism of your takes.
He will be fired in the next 10 days.
If Currie doesn't start until May 1 who is going to fire Manning?
And on the buyout, if anything remotely close to what has been rumored is true, we need a MAJOR overhaul of our AD processes.
If Currie doesn't start until May 1 who is going to fire Manning?
And on the buyout, if anything remotely close to what has been rumored is true, we need a MAJOR overhaul of our AD processes.
Seems the opposite to me. It seems the timing is made exactly to let the coaches know the job will be available and that there will be a new AD. If a coach was already lined up, why the need to do it before the end of the season?
Yeah, that makes sense, but first we receive speculation about the possibility of a lot more going on BTS, then we find out through Les' article that his start date is May 1. Plus the buyout.
But you're logic about signaling to prospective coaches that "(interesting) things are afoot at the Circle K." Why does this need another two months? Wellman has had 27 years. Move aside.
Hopefully you're right and the process starts in earnest on March 12th, the day after Danny is shown the door at the ACCT. Still though, would be a lot nicer to think this is all finished business and the "transition date" is just in deference to Ron and allowing him to save some face on the way out.
Timing is everything on these coaches hires. But more than anything, I'm concerned about lack of resources and commitment to paying what is necessary to get the best coach possible.
Agree with your statement but may be as long as 30 days. Who knows for sure. Likely Currie will be in close proximity to Wellman beginning tomorrow and have final say on Manning's future. Shah will be involved also. I for one have been anticipating this day for over 10 years!
$18M contract buyout is an obstacle but not insurmountable as settlement at a lower figure can be negotiated. WFU probably has very capable legal beagles who will be able to reduce that settlement.
Because that’s how most processes go especially for a longtime AD. We are replacing a disgraced AD with an available disgraced AD who is an alum. That doesn’t happen very often because most universities hire an AD who is currently employed as an AD.
posted this week that unrest within UA had reached toxic levels to the point of no return.
It is not a coincidence my last post coincided with this weekend news.
Because that’s how most processes go especially for a longtime AD. We are replacing a disgraced AD with an available disgraced AD who is an alum. That doesn’t happen very often because most universities hire an AD who is currently employed as an AD.
I wonder if Bruce Pearl has any interest in coaching in the ACC.