• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Criticism of Religions..Criticism of Christianity.Criticism of Islam..

Lectro

Banhammer'd
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
8,876
Reaction score
254
Criticism of Hinduism. Criticism of Scientology and Dianetics.Criticism of even the gnat-sweeping priests of the religion of Jain. Criticism of Aleister Crowley and John Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard’s Church of Scientology. Criticism of Anton Levy’s Church of Satan..


Do the operators of this board allow criticism of such?

Do tell..you harbingers of Freedom..what exceeds your limit? Where does your speech end and Freedom’s begin?

The question is rhetorical, of course.
 
Calling a congresswoman a "jihadi" simply for being Muslim is not "criticism", its fucking bigotry.
 
Calling a congresswoman a "jihadi" simply for being Muslim is not "criticism", its fucking bigotry.

Well then pally ol’ boy, lets have a sing along shall we..

“You say Jihadi, I say Gelato.. Gelato, Jihadi whose got Biscotti”
 
Lectro getting #nervous he might be going to ban camp again, last time for threatening violence, this time for blatant bigotry. What’s in store next week?
 
Ilhan Omar speaks:

“In a 2012 Omar tweet, for instance, the Democrat explained that “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.”

Lectro could possibly answer (if it is allowed by the piss pants crowd):

“The Middle Eastern Islamics have hypnotized the world, may YAHWEH awaken the people and help them see the evil of Middle Eastern Islam”

Make no mistake.. the urge to destroy Israel long precedes its status as a state in 1948. Don’t argue that I am speaking of Israel but not of Judaism.. that I am talking of a state, not a religion. Israel is Judaism.
 
Standard leftist intellectual and moral alchemy: Muslims have become an officially designated victim group. They cannot be criticized, especially by members of groups officially designated as oppressors.
 
Calling a congresswoman a "jihadi" simply for being Muslim is not "criticism", its fucking bigotry.

Ilhan Omar supports Jihad just the same as Linda Sarsour and Rashida Tlaib.

As a devotee of Muhammad, one must necessarily be committed to Jihad.

Scholarship to back this claim provided by this man:

Raymond Ibrahim (born 1973) is an American research librarian, translator, author and columnist. His focus is Arabic history and language,[1] and current events. He is the author of three books, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam's New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).

Ibrahim was born in the United States to Coptic immigrants from Egypt.[2] He is fluent in Arabic and English. Ibrahim studied at California State University, Fresno, where he wrote a Master's thesis under Victor Davis Hanson on an early military encounter between Islam and Byzantium based on medieval Arabic and Greek texts. Ibrahim also took graduate courses at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies and studied toward a PhD in medieval Islamic history at Catholic University.[3]
 
But don’t ask Omar if she supports Jihad. She is obliged to lie..

Raymond Ibrahim on the ‘art’ of Tequiyya:

“Taqiyya presents a range of ethical dilemmas. Anyone who truly believes that God justifies and, through his prophet's example, even encourages deception will not experience any ethical qualms over lying. Consider the case of 'Ali Mohammad, bin Laden's first "trainer" and long-time Al-Qaeda operative. An Egyptian, he was initially a member of Islamic Jihad and had served in the Egyptian army's military intelligence unit. After 1984, he worked for a time with the CIA in Germany. Though considered untrustworthy, he managed to get to California where he enlisted in the U.S. Army. It seems likely that he continued to work in some capacity for the CIA. He later trained jihadists in the United States and Afghanistan and was behind several terror attacks in Africa. People who knew him regarded him with "fear and awe for his incredible self-confidence, his inability to be intimidated, absolute ruthless determination to destroy the enemies of Islam, and his zealous belief in the tenets of militant Islamic fundamentalism."[46] Indeed, this sentence sums it all up: For a zealous belief in Islam's tenets, which legitimize deception in order to make God's word supreme, will certainly go a long way in creating "incredible self-confidence" when lying.[47]”
 
All religion should be openly mocked and criticized. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and all that. But there’s a big difference in being prejudicial towards someone like the congresswoman and being critical of her ideas/beliefs, or the tenants of the specific religion. I believe Islam is bad and wrong and damaging to humanity. I can say that without referring to Omar as a jihadi without evidence.
 
And that’s great..but we have evidence that she supports Jihad.

So back you go to the drawing board.
 
Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar once described acts of terrorism as a reaction to “our involvement in other people’s affairs,” in the wake of the brutal al-Shabab attack on a Kenyan shopping mall in 2013.

Omar made the comments during an obscure local television appearance just weeks after four armed al-Shabab jihadists stormed the Westgate mall in Nairobi in 2013, killing nearly 70 people and wounding 200.


Ignorant little Jihadi she is..
 
““Who objects to Saudi Arabia being Islamic? Or any of the other 48 Muslim states? The issue with Iran isn’t their state religion; it’s their terror-loving leaders that are condemned. @IlhanMN needs to learn about the world before she’s out of excuses for her antisemitism,” he wrote.”
 
This loser spammed until late last night and then started spamming again this morning before 4:30!
 
All religion should be openly mocked and criticized. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and all that. But there’s a big difference in being prejudicial towards someone like the congresswoman and being critical of her ideas/beliefs, or the tenants of the specific religion. I believe Islam is bad and wrong and damaging to humanity. I can say that without referring to Omar as a jihadi without evidence.

Do think the same about Christianity? Is it "bad and damaging to humanity"?
 
Interesting concept, "tenants" of religion.

Makes a little sense, in a way.
 
Interesting concept, "tenants" of religion.

Makes a little sense, in a way.

Especially when religious institutions own so much land. I'd think they'd be landlords rather than tenants.
 
Back
Top