• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

DOJ And Clinton Lawyers Struck Secret Deal To Block FBI Access To Clinton Foundation

Most of the "phony dossier" has been proven to be accurate. But the crazy, brainwashed are too blind to know this.
 
Lectro said:
Well how about you list them off hot shot
Click to expand...

He won’t. He’s full of shit.

He still think Manafort and the polling data=collusion with Russia

Someone explain to the deranged and demented that mueller has been charged and sentenced already

Nothin about collusion

And yet the trump administration increases the sanctions on Russia and the MSM says nada

I really wish I knew where the Orange County Kook got his talking points from

Any clue, Ole Lec?
 
I thought collusion isn’t a crime so how could he have been sentenced to it?
 
marquee moon said:
WOW

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...agreement-block-fbi-access-clinton-foundation
Click to expand...

Lectro said:
.. a truth that can’t be told. If it were a work of fiction it would be more believable. Alas, perhaps this is the genius of the thing.
Click to expand...

sailordeac said:
the Obama administration corrupted the intelligence services, the DoJ, the DoS, the IRS, the FBI, nice! that's what getting in bed with the Clintons will do for you, they are like a fucking incurable venereal disease

stay tuned for further revelations
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
marquee moon said:
He won’t. He’s full of shit.

He still think Manafort and the polling data=collusion with Russia

Someone explain to the deranged and demented that mueller has been charged and sentenced already

Nothin about collusion

And yet the trump administration increases the sanctions on Russia and the MSM says nada

I really wish I knew where the Orange County Kook got his talking points from

Any clue, Ole Lec?
Click to expand...

Where they get all of their info.. Buzzfeed, the off-Spring of hatchet work from ‘generators’ like Fusion to dispensers like Media Matters ..it’s all an enormous shit spreader..and once these outlets-subsidiaries release the story then there is license for the controlling organs to follow suit. Thus the large outlets avoid libel.
 
Lectro said:
Well how about you list them off hot shot
Click to expand...

For the 8000th time, here you go. Educate yourself:

The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.

In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.

With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele’s reporting holds up over time. In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos. We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.

These materials buttress some of Steele’s reporting, both specifically and thematically. The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven.

But much of the reporting simply remains uncorroborated, at least by the yardstick we are using. Most significantly, the dossier reports a “well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [Trump and his associates] and the Russian leadership,” including an “intelligence exchange [that] had been running between them for at least 8 years.” There has been significant investigative reporting about long-standing connections between Trump, his associates and Kremlin-affiliated individuals, and Trump himself acknowledged that the purpose of a June 2016 meeting between his son, Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-connected lawyer was to obtain “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. But there is, at present, no evidence in the official record that confirms other direct ties or their relevance to the 2016 presidential campaign. With that caveat, here are excerpts from the dossier that correspond with details contained in official documents.

Full: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective
 
Moonz must think that his insults gives his conspiratorial blathering more effect. Meanwhile everyone save the other stooges think him a moron.
 
Newenglanddeac said:
For the 8000th time, here you go. Educate yourself:

The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.

In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.

With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele’s reporting holds up over time. In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos. We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.

These materials buttress some of Steele’s reporting, both specifically and thematically. The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven.

But much of the reporting simply remains uncorroborated, at least by the yardstick we are using. Most significantly, the dossier reports a “well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [Trump and his associates] and the Russian leadership,” including an “intelligence exchange [that] had been running between them for at least 8 years.” There has been significant investigative reporting about long-standing connections between Trump, his associates and Kremlin-affiliated individuals, and Trump himself acknowledged that the purpose of a June 2016 meeting between his son, Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-connected lawyer was to obtain “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. But there is, at present, no evidence in the official record that confirms other direct ties or their relevance to the 2016 presidential campaign. With that caveat, here are excerpts from the dossier that correspond with details contained in official documents.

Full: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective
Click to expand...

And yet mueller found nothing
 
marquee moon said:
And yet mueller found nothing
Click to expand...

Yeah 40+ indictments and multiple guilty pleas before the investigation has finished = nothing. Just because you and your dear leader repeat “witch hunt” ad nauseam doesn’t make it true.
 
Newenglanddeac said:
Yeah 40+ indictments and multiple guilty pleas before the investigation has finished = nothing. Just because you and your dear leader repeat “witch hunt” ad nauseam doesn’t make it true.
Click to expand...

It is right and appropriate that those few voices on the left who’ve been sharply critical of Russiagate from the beginning are now taking some time to gloat at and mock its peddlers with increasing scorn. The centrists who chose to spend more than two years forcing everyone’s energy into this blatant psyop which escalated a cold war against a nuclear superpower were wrong, and the leftists who objected to it were right. Trump’s term is more than halfway over, and Russiagaters chose to suck all the oxygen out of the room for this brainless, fruitless, worthless endeavor instead of allowing space for progressive reform and for criticism of Trump’s actual pernicious policies from the left. And they did it on purpose.
Mock the Russiagaters. Mock them ruthlessly, and never, ever let them forget the horrible thing that they did. Never stop making fun of them and reminding them how stupid and crazy they acted during this humiliating period of American history. And never stop using it as a weapon against them. They were wrong, so they should not be leading the way on what passes for America’s political left today. Skepticism was the only appropriate response to Russiagate in a post-Iraq invasion world, and those on the left who made that appropriate response should be treated with infinitely more respect and deference than those who did not.
They were wrong, we were right, and now even Nancy Pelosi is all but admitting it. Never let them forget it.
 
Right so since you’ve seen the Mueller Report that definitively concludes that, hows about sharing it with us?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top