• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

How much of the Mueller Report will be redacted

How much of the Mueller Report will be redacted"

  • 0-20%

    Votes: 7 30.4%

  • 21-40%

    Votes: 4 17.4%

  • 41-60%

    Votes: 6 26.1%

  • 61-80%

    Votes: 5 21.7%

  • 81+%

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
sailordeac said:
supportive of what?
Click to expand...

Let me guess, you don't support any redactions and want the full report released but will you happily jump on this thread and say anyone upset that the report is going through a redaction process, over seen by the guy the President appointed, is deranged and under the liberal media's biased spell.
 
ImTheCaptain said:
fuck it; how much could we possibly be giving away. burn it all down.
Click to expand...

Yea really. And that gives them cover to redact things for “national security concerns” that aren’t actually national security concerns.
 
I'm sure sailor would be ok with President Hillary's AG doing the same
 
sailordeac said:
Not redacting anything is fine by me, and I have said that before.
Click to expand...

Then why are you stopping by this thread to say shit like "whatever the amount the lefty media and Dem pols will hyperventilate and claim that the proof of Trump's collusion with Russia is in the redacted part" mocking people for calling for the entire report to be released. (Commas would also help, by the way.)
 
Yea. Sailor needs to clarify if he’s “fine with Barr’s redactions” or “fine by me” if the whole thing is released. There’s a not a middle ground there, especially given Barr’s super shady past with these things.
 
DDA said:
Yea. Sailor needs to clarify if he’s “fine with Barr’s redactions” or “fine by me” if the whole thing is released. There’s a not a middle ground there, especially given Barr’s super shady past with these things.
Click to expand...

That’s what Rachel told me!!!!!
 
Then why are you stopping by this thread to say shit like "whatever the amount the lefty media and Dem pols will hyperventilate and claim that the proof of Trump's collusion with Russia is in the redacted part" mocking people for calling for the entire report to be released. (Commas would also help, by the way.)
Click to expand...

Yea. Sailor needs to clarify if he’s “fine with Barr’s redactions” or “fine by me” if the whole thing is released. There’s a not a middle ground there, especially given Barr’s super shady past with these things.
Click to expand...

My statement read, "Not redacting anything is fine by me, and I have said that before." And it does not, and did not, need additional commas.

You guys are hallucinating. As I have repeatedly said, I have no problem with the realease of the unredacted Mueller Report. Indeed, I would like to see all of the materials released, unredacted, that are related to the Russia hoax, and that includes the FISA applications and information collected by intelligence agencies.
 
sailordeac said:
My statement read, "Not redacting anything is fine by me, and I have said that before." And it does not, and did not, need additional commas.

You guys are hallucinating. As I have repeatedly said, I have no problem with the realease of the unredacted Mueller Report. Indeed, I would like to see all of the materials released, unredacted, that are related to the Russia hoax, and that includes the FISA applications and information collected by intelligence agencies.
Click to expand...

you need a comma here:

whatever the amount, the lefty media and Dem pols will hyperventilate and claim that the proof of Trump's collusion with Russia is in the redacted part
 
sailordeac said:
My statement read, "Not redacting anything is fine by me, and I have said that before." And it does not, and did not, need additional commas.

You guys are hallucinating. As I have repeatedly said, I have no problem with the realease of the unredacted Mueller Report. Indeed, I would like to see all of the materials released, unredacted, that are related to the Russia hoax, and that includes the FISA applications and information collected by intelligence agencies.
Click to expand...

You're so right. It's a hoax.

It's not like his campaign manager didn't work one of Putin's top associates and make over $20M in a decade.

It's not like his NSA wasn't paid to speak to the new Pravda and sit with Putin.

It's not like is son-in-law didn't meet with Russian diplomats and try to set up a direct line to Putin that US intel wouldn't have access to.

It's not like Putin's piggy bank didn't bail Trump Tower Toronto out with a $100M+ loan.

It's not like Trump''s longtime buddy, Roger Stone, didn't meet with Russian agent Gucifer.

It's not like Putin's buddy didn't launder millions by grossly overpaying for a Trump property and then show up at Trump campaign events.

It's not like Trump didn't take out anti-Russian language from the RNC platform.

It's not like Trump didn't have AG Sessions let of Russians money launderers with barely a slap on the wrist for a $220M scam.

It's not like Trump Soho wasn't financed by convicted Russian mobster Felix Sater.

This is just SOME of what we know to be fact. Imagine what we don't know.
 
BarcaDeac said:
you need a comma here:

whatever the amount, the lefty media and Dem pols will hyperventilate and claim that the proof of Trump's collusion with Russia is in the redacted part
Click to expand...


even without the comma, that particular sentence was easily intelligible, save apparently to those suffering from advanced TDS
 
sailordeac said:
My statement read, "Not redacting anything is fine by me, and I have said that before." And it does not, and did not, need additional commas.

You guys are hallucinating. As I have repeatedly said, I have no problem with the realease of the unredacted Mueller Report. Indeed, I would like to see all of the materials released, unredacted, that are related to the Russia hoax, and that includes the FISA applications and information collected by intelligence agencies.
Click to expand...

I literally quoted your comment where you mock people for holding the same opinion as you, only stronger. No hallucinations on my part, perhaps selective memory on your part.
 
RJKarl said:
You're so right. It's a hoax.

It's not like his campaign manager didn't work one of Putin's top associates and make over $20M in a decade.

It's not like his NSA wasn't paid to speak to the new Pravda and sit with Putin.

It's not like is son-in-law didn't meet with Russian diplomats and try to set up a direct line to Putin that US intel wouldn't have access to.

It's not like Putin's piggy bank didn't bail Trump Tower Toronto out with a $100M+ loan.

It's not like Trump''s longtime buddy, Roger Stone, didn't meet with Russian agent Gucifer.

It's not like Putin's buddy didn't launder millions by grossly overpaying for a Trump property and then show up at Trump campaign events.

It's not like Trump didn't take out anti-Russian language from the RNC platform.

It's not like Trump didn't have AG Sessions let of Russians money launderers with barely a slap on the wrist for a $220M scam.

It's not like Trump Soho wasn't financed by convicted Russian mobster Felix Sater.

This is just SOME of what we know to be fact. Imagine what we don't know.
Click to expand...

So why didn’t Mueller recommend an indictment?
 
marquee moon said:
So why didn’t Mueller recommend an indictment?
Click to expand...

You need a smoking gun, without it is a TON of circumstantial evidence. Public opinion (which is what Trump is worried about now) and proving in court is very different.
 
And according to DOJ (and especially Trump uber-defender AG Barr), you can't indict a sitting POTUS.
 
birdman said:
I literally quoted your comment where you mock people for holding the same opinion as you, only stronger. No hallucinations on my part, perhaps selective memory on your part.
Click to expand...

You are still hallucinating, and desperately so. I don't disagree with people for wanting the entire Mueller Report made public, I disagree with them for hyping an obviously fraudulent Russia hoax no matter what is in the Mueller Report, or what is redacted or unredacted in that report. Really, give it a rest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top