• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Donald Impeachment

You are wrong about either the facts or the process being on the House Dems side. Neither are. If you think that you can sell the absurdity of what Schiff and his pals in the House are doing as a legitimate impeachment, go ahead, make Trump's day.

The Constitution provides for no particular process. The House gets to make their own rules, which can be changed. It may not be a good idea politically, but that is a separate question.
 

The New York Times reported last week that Parnas had told associates he paid Giuliani hundreds of thousands of dollars for what Giuliani said was business and legal advice. Giuliani said for the first time on Monday that the total amount was $500,000.

Giuliani told Reuters the money came in two payments made within weeks of each other. He said he could not recall the dates of the payments. He said most of the work he did for Fraud Guarantee was completed in 2018 but that he had been doing follow-up for over a year.

According to an indictment unsealed by U.S. prosecutors, an unidentified Russian businessman arranged for two $500,000 wires to be sent from foreign bank accounts to a U.S. account controlled by Fruman in September and October 2018. The money was used, in part, by Fruman, Parnas and two other men charged in the indictment to gain influence with U.S. politicians and candidates, the indictment said.

Seems totally normal.
 
The Constitution provides for no particular process. The House gets to make their own rules, which can be changed. It may not be a good idea politically, but that is a separate question.

why? an impeachment - the reversal of an election, in this case - is a political process, the Dems lack of fairness and partisanship is going to get its just reward
 
why? an impeachment - the reversal of an election, in this case - is a political process, the Dems lack of fairness and partisanship is going to get its just reward

an impeachment is not a 'reversal of an election'
 
an impeachment is not a 'reversal of an election'

sorry, in this case, it is an attempt to undo the result of an election

it's the only thing the Dems appear to be interested in, and it will be their undoing

so go ahead, be my guest, carry on with the dishonest and dishonorable leadership of Adam Schiff
 
why? an impeachment - the reversal of an election, in this case - is a political process, the Dems lack of fairness and partisanship is going to get its just reward

The dems partisanship.
How many bills has moscow mitch not brought up for a vote? Novosibirsk nunes and leningrad lindsay are the epitome of bipartisan.
So much delusion.
 
The fun game is to ignore him then predict what’s the hidden post. It’s like board jeopardy. It’s not a really challenging game though. The easiest clues are any post that should be a response to a question is basically sailor saying you should look something up. About every third post is some “clever” nickname he’s come up with and put on the metaphorical fridge for approval.

You can guess many by checking the latest from Matt Gaetz's twitter:

 
The dems partisanship.
How many bills has moscow mitch not brought up for a vote? Novosibirsk nunes and leningrad lindsay are the epitome of bipartisan.
So much delusion.

stop deflecting, if impeachment is widely perceived as partisan, it becomes a counterproductive loser

so, proceed at your peril
 
Back
Top