• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Donald Impeachment

Sailor show us where an inquiry vote is required (by law or constitution) to initiate impeachment proceedings please.

I think we all know that even if an inquiry vote took place you would find alternative reasons to call this all a sham. My money is either on: 1) well GOP didn’t vote to open the inquiry so this is merely a partisan witch hunt or 2) this is just to undermine the 2016 election - unconstitutional damnit!
 
Sailor show us where an inquiry vote is required (by law or constitution) to initiate impeachment proceedings please.

I think we all know that even if an inquiry vote took place you would find alternative reasons to call this all a sham. My money is either on: 1) well GOP didn’t vote to open the inquiry so this is merely a partisan witch hunt or 2) this is just to undermine the 2016 election - unconstitutional damnit!

Stop interacting with Sailor
 
If the Dems held a vote, the GOP would come up with another excuse.
 
Even if sailor were to get it, he’s too far gone at this point to acknowledge that a “leftist” might be right. Full on deranged for Trump
 
Did you ever check them out? Link: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/245152-issa-escorted-out-of-benghazi-deposition

Here is Republican Trey Gowdy removing Issa from a closed-door impeachment hearing. The Clinton impeachment worked the same exact way this one is, except for the fact that democrats complied with subpoenas.

When all you do is echo talking points without doing your own research, its the definition of ignorant.

Dems complied with subpoenas bc the only thing to hide was a blowie. Reps aren't complying bc they are guilty.
 
Sailor show us where an inquiry vote is required (by law or constitution) to initiate impeachment proceedings please.

I think we all know that even if an inquiry vote took place you would find alternative reasons to call this all a sham. My money is either on: 1) well GOP didn’t vote to open the inquiry so this is merely a partisan witch hunt or 2) this is just to undermine the 2016 election - unconstitutional damnit!

lol. I know the answer to this one.
 
What the hell?

Sometimes I think Pelosi doesn’t understand that she’s dealing with the biggest scandal in US history, not just presidential or political history. All time. History will not look kindly on her if these people aren’t punished.

All she needs to do is float stories about Susan McDougal to normalize jailing people for refusing to comply with subpoenas, then give Guliani and their goons a warning to comply. Then do it.
 
Sometimes I think Pelosi doesn’t understand that she’s dealing with the biggest scandal in US history, not just presidential or political history. All time. History will not look kindly on her if these people aren’t punished.

All she needs to do is float stories about Susan McDougal to normalize jailing people for refusing to comply with subpoenas, then give Guliani and their goons a warning to comply. Then do it.

And just less than half of this country believes that the real scandal is with Joe and Hunter Biden and that Trump is being unnecessarily persecuted. Add to that maybe future histories will be as muddy in the future as our present is now and that we will just continue to reside in our alternate universes. I'm not defending Pelosi. But Walter Cronkite is dead, and this process isn't as easy as some here make it out to be.
 
That’s the point. She can shape history and she’s hesitating.
 
 
maybe, but there is certainly momentum right now and eventually headlines of "X guy testifies to something about Ukraine" is going to get old
 
I think they've been going about this the right way, but I think they should start flexing muscle on people who have zero claim of privilege such as Guiliani and Lewandowski.
 
Back
Top