WFFaithful
Well-known member
Last edited:
Vengeance tour is getting started.
lol at the resident board pussy who has to anonymously post “djt never hits 1st” in the tags
Sen. Collins says seeking retribution against impeachment witnesses is inappropriate
https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02...mpeachment-acquital-would-not-be-appropriate/
“I think it’s important to understand that when you’re in an impeachment trial, you consider the evidence that is before you,” the Republican senator said after an event in South Portland. “You don’t try to make predictions. You consider the evidence that’s before you. In this case, the evidence did not meet the high bar that’s established by the Constitution for immediate removal of the president from office. So that was the basis for my decision.”
She could have voted for more evidence.
The latest to join this self-delusion caucus is Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. “I believe that the president has learned from this case,” she told CBS News’s Norah O’Donnell on Tuesday, expanding on a floor speech in which she announced — surprise — her vote to acquit. “The president has been impeached. That’s a pretty big lesson.”
O’Donnell wasn’t buying it. “But the president says he did nothing wrong. Why do you think he learned something?” she asked.
“He was impeached,” Collins repeated, in a demonstration of the eternal sunshine of the spotless senatorial mind. “And there has been criticism by both Republican and Democratic senators of his call. I believe that he will be much more cautious in the future.
Trump waited until after impeachment to fire the witnesses. He waited until after the 2018 election to accept Jeff Session's resignation. What will he do on November 4, 2020 if he wins the election? That question should scare everybody.
Sen. Collins says seeking retribution against impeachment witnesses is inappropriate
https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02...mpeachment-acquital-would-not-be-appropriate/
“I think it’s important to understand that when you’re in an impeachment trial, you consider the evidence that is before you,” the Republican senator said after an event in South Portland. “You don’t try to make predictions. You consider the evidence that’s before you. In this case, the evidence did not meet the high bar that’s established by the Constitution for immediate removal of the president from office. So that was the basis for my decision.”
She could have voted for more evidence.
“I think it’s important to understand that when you’re in an impeachment trial, you consider the evidence that is before you,” the Republican senator said after an event in South Portland. “You don’t try to make predictions. You consider the evidence that’s before you. In this case, the evidence did not meet the high bar that’s established by the Constitution for immediate removal of the president from office. So that was the basis for my decision.”
She could have voted for more evidence.
The latest to join this self-delusion caucus is Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. “I believe that the president has learned from this case,” she told CBS News’s Norah O’Donnell on Tuesday, expanding on a floor speech in which she announced — surprise — her vote to acquit. “The president has been impeached. That’s a pretty big lesson.”
O’Donnell wasn’t buying it. “But the president says he did nothing wrong. Why do you think he learned something?” she asked.
“He was impeached,” Collins repeated, in a demonstration of the eternal sunshine of the spotless senatorial mind. “And there has been criticism by both Republican and Democratic senators of his call. I believe that he will be much more cautious in the future.
“I think it’s important to understand that when you’re in an impeachment trial, you consider the evidence that is before you,” the Republican senator said after an event in South Portland. “You don’t try to make predictions. You consider the evidence that’s before you. In this case, the evidence did not meet the high bar that’s established by the Constitution for immediate removal of the president from office. So that was the basis for my decision.”
She could have voted for more evidence.
To be fair, she did vote for more witnesses.
To be fair, she did vote for more witnesses.