• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

A college degree is a lousy investment

That's a good read aside from the click bait title. The actual problems need to be addressed in proper context. My fear is that Bernie or Hillary proposals overshoot and end up being a hand out to upper class parents.
 
Colleges that offer the most economic mobility (answer: mid-tier public)
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017...es-might-give-you-the-best-bang-for-your-buck
and
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...at-are-engines-of_us_58adf529e4b01f4ab51c75a1

The elites are by and for the rich.

Colleges ranked by employ-ability (Wake #85)
https://www.timeshighereducation.co...-united-states-ranked-employers#survey-answer

Washington Monthly enters the college ranking game
http://washingtonmonthly.com/college_guide

Forbes Best Values
https://www.forbes.com/sites/caroli...00-schools-worth-the-investment/#6df2df57900e

The Economist ranks on the delta of expected earnings to median earnings (Washington and Lee #1; Wake #57 - Expect: $55k, Median $61k for a +$6k)
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/10/value-university

My guidance counselor recommended W&L to me, but I didn't consider it due to lack of D1 sports.
 
Colleges with big endowments will win
https://thinkprogress.org/stanford-...than-125-000-per-year-72f63bc3a96e#.kckp858q0

But Stanford isn’t the only place offering free tuition. Princeton offers free tuition to parents who make less than $120,000 and free room and board to those who make under $60,000. Harvard and Yale make tuition free for families who make less than $65,000, while Harvard asks those who make between that level and $150,000 to contribute between 0 and 10 percent of their income.

Some good news on a potential new trend

All of those programs would be moot, however, if the government took a simple step and made all public universities free. Tuition at all public colleges came to $62.6 billion in 2012. The federal government could take the $69 billion it currently spends helping students cover the cost of college through grants, tax breaks, and work-study funds and instead simply cover tuition at those schools for anyone who wanted to attend. That would give all students of all income backgrounds an affordable option, and it could also put pressure on private schools like Stanford and Harvard to reduce their tuition to compete, which has risen 13 percent over the last five years.
 
awaken citing Think Progress?

There's no way such a plan would work. At the most basic level, most states are Republican controlled and wouldn't support a plan that would give the federal government that much influence over public universities unless it came from a Republican administration which it wouldn't.
 

This is a major source of cognitive dissonance in Student Affairs. Your ultimate [stated] goal is to empower students, but there are so many secondary [some unstated] goals: grow attendance ($), maintain high retention ($), justify position/become entrenched in University ($ and job security; this one is not unique to this industry).

It can be incongruous and artificial amidst actual solid, important work.
 
Employability? That's ridiculous. Universities should help students become more employable and help them better determine their career goals.
 
I'm glad I'm not a 17 or 18 year old today. I'd hate to have to say no to my dream school (like Wake) because I don't want to spend almost $300K on an undergraduate education.

Honestly, if you have plans to attend grad school/law school etc..., why wouldn't you choose a quality public institution and reserve your debt commitments for post-grad work?
 
No you can do lots of technical stuff with a masters if you're not looking to get into the research/publishing race.
 
i don't know that life, are you paid to do your masters?
 
Back
Top