Sounds like king trumpf could be convicted in the Senate impeachment trial listening to McConnell....
I mean, if you can't get convicted for inciting an "erection" at the Capitol to delay the lawful and peaceful transfer of power that kills 5 people, then there's no need to even have such an impeachment process. :dumb:
I believe the Democrats made a mistake pushing Impeachment to the front of the line. Time works to their benefit. It allows the government and the press the opportunity to widen the net of all involved in insurrection and to the depth of their participation. If there is direct implication of members of Congress and within the Trump administration, and their involvement can be proved, the idea of a witch hunt disappears and the fact of sedition/treason becomes apparent.
Even if McConnell decides to support a Trump conviction (hardly a given) I'm still dubious that 16 other Republicans will vote to convict. Seeing the outraged and vindictive reaction from House Republicans towards Liz Cheney and the other 9 House Republicans that voted to impeach will only make them more hesitant.
you think facts and evidence matter to the people who think Trump is the victim of a witch hunt?
The further away we get from the events of January 6th, the longer the right wing media spin machine has to try to erase the history of what we saw and felt during that fucking Insurrection. The time to hold people accountable is now.