A few thoughts. I get the hate for the Bridgewater contract in terms of cost and length, though agree with Ph and Buttermaker that Rhule and Brady had to sign off on bringing Bridgewater in. And I'm not a Hurney fan or hater, but objectively, last year's draft was pretty decent. Chinn and Brown were immediate impact players, and Pride and Gross-Matos saw a fair amount of action. And Burns from the prior year is becoming a stud. I get liking to trade back - Ozzie Newsome and now DeCosta have a penchant for that as well. But the Hurney criticism from Teppur and Rhule falls flat, and it sound like they doth protest too much.
Everybody loves Pitts. Everybody. But he ain't slipping past 6. If Atlanta stays at 4, they likely take Pitts. Cincy would have to think about addressing LT at the top of the 2nd if Pitts is still on the board. And Miami is definitely taking Pitts if he's there. And if they don't, Detroit will. Pitts is likely the only non-QB in the top 10 that another team would trade up for.
As for the QB position, I'd rather have any 1 of the rookie QBs over Darnold. First, you get them for 4+ years on a rookie contract. And to me, Darnold and Goff are the same QB. They can get coached up to have good games occasionally, but whenever they go up against a good D with a great coordinator, they struggle. Witness Darnold seeing ghosts against NE, and NE completely shutting Goff out in the SB. The word from that SB is Belichick showed a lot of man looks but mostly retreated into different zones. Which is what happened to Fields in the NW game. I think it was McShay pointing this out the other day. The knock on Fields is he has played in a system where he rarely has to look to a 2nd or 3rd option, and NW confused him with man looks that were zones. So Fields baseline is basically he's a much more athletic version of Darnold, but his ceiling could be a top 10 QB. Likewise, I'm really intrigued with Lance, despite his limited resume at a smaller program. And I think Jones compares favorably to Darnold. They're similar from an athleticism standpoint - maybe Darnold is slightly quicker with a slightly stronger arm, but you ain't running the read option with either of them. But Jones is smarter and processes info better, which is why Shanahan loves him. I'd be surprised if Jones doesn't have the superior career to Darnold.