Page 5 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567891015 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 510

Thread: Perma ban: RJKarl

  1. #81
    Someone has a weird obsession where they related everything back to hanging out with naked men, NTTAWWT

  2. #82
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Gossett Jr View Post
    Someone has a weird obsession where they related everything back to hanging out with naked men, NTTAWWT
    Not sure... what that means, but thank you for sharing. Might mean a lot more about you than me, but I could be mistaken.
    You do understand the notion of low hanging fruit, don’t you?

  3. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by 1976Deac View Post
    Nope. It is different, and that is significant, and the Massas should make that clear to Wake fans who mistake it inadvertently for a sports board.
    Boy oh boy.

    Also, this sports board is not a locker room or a business. Why do you think the mods should treat it like one?

  4. #84
    Agreed. That was my point. Just make it clear that opinions or culture contrary to the Massas are unacceptable, and there will be nothing else to discuss.

  5. #85
    I like that another shitty boomer in a quest to support their friend, a shitty boomer who has been given every possible chance is dropping racial slurs, you know you could just leave the boards instead of getting banned.

  6. #86
    Quote Originally Posted by 1976Deac View Post
    Agreed. That was my point. Just make it clear that opinions or culture contrary to the Massas are unacceptable, and there will be nothing else to discuss.
    If you don’t think there is anything left to discuss you are free to take your racist words and go.

  7. #87
    Quote Originally Posted by ConnorEl View Post
    No doubt rj wasn't going to change. So yeah, it boiled down to either accepting him as he is, ignoring him, or complaining about him. Clearly, the constant complaints of those unable to accept or ignore him wore down the moderators.
    Ah, yes, very good. When Diggler hacked RJ's account, RJ could have accepted him, ignored him, or complained about him. The constant complaints apparently wore down the moderators and forced them to ban him.

    For what it's worth, when I was moderator, we received far more complaints from RJ than about RJ, and those in the latter category were never about "RJ being RJ" but about actionable or debatably-actionable offenses. However, if the moderators are as susceptible to complaints as you think, perhaps your complaining on this thread will wear them down enough to lead them to reverse their decision. There's always hope.

  8. #88
    Quote Originally Posted by 1976Deac View Post
    Agreed. That was my point. Just make it clear that opinions or culture contrary to the Massas are unacceptable, and there will be nothing else to discuss.
    Do I need to go through the standard reporting process or will me quoting in the thread that the mods started suffice? Juuuuuuust wondering.

  9. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Gossett Jr View Post
    I like that another shitty boomer in a quest to support their friend, a shitty boomer who has been given every possible chance is dropping racial slurs, you know you could just leave the boards instead of getting banned.


    “Shitty boomer” is probably an upgrade for me, thanks.

  10. #90
    People be mad ageist on here.
    Sad.

  11. #91
    RJ certainly brought most of the grief he got on himself by never letting anything go.

    And there were certainly circumstances where RJs rhetoric was clearly gross. the entire Nazi prison guard scenario for instance.

    The use of Massa as a rhetorical device? Meh.

  12. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    The use of Massa as a rhetorical device? Meh.
    Probably want to look up the definition of “rhetorical device”

  13. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by 1976Deac View Post
    Not sure... what that means, but thank you for sharing. Might mean a lot more about you than me, but I could be mistaken.
    You do understand the notion of low hanging fruit, don’t you?
    Why are you talking about saggy testicles in the locker room?
    Birds are real.

  14. #94
    Quote Originally Posted by BeachBumDeac View Post
    Probably want to look up the definition of “rhetorical device”
    Is hyperbole a rhetorical device? Yep.

  15. #95
    Quote Originally Posted by birdman View Post
    Why are you talking about saggy testicles in the locker room?
    Actually, no, but thank you for volunteering.

  16. #96
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL68 View Post
    Is hyperbole a rhetorical device? Yep.
    Is speaking in a patois identifiable as an African slave hyperbole?

  17. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by OldGoldBeard View Post
    Ah, yes, very good. When Diggler hacked RJ's account, RJ could have accepted him, ignored him, or complained about him. The constant complaints apparently wore down the moderators and forced them to ban him.

    For what it's worth, when I was moderator, we received far more complaints from RJ than about RJ, and those in the latter category were never about "RJ being RJ" but about actionable or debatably-actionable offenses. However, if the moderators are as susceptible to complaints as you think, perhaps your complaining on this thread will wear them down enough to lead them to reverse their decision. There's always hope.

    Thanks.


    I have been chiding those offering “constant complaints” to the moderators. If RJ was the biggest complainer about others, that’s on him.
    I love mankind...it’s people I can’t stand!!

  18. #98
    Quote Originally Posted by BeachBumDeac View Post
    Is speaking in a patois identifiable as an African slave hyperbole?
    Us shitty boomers probably don’t understand that.

  19. #99
    Quote Originally Posted by BeachBumDeac View Post
    Is speaking in a patois identifiable as an African slave hyperbole?
    When somebody says for instance "yes Massa" they are typically being critical of the person who is the perceived oppressor in that situation. Are they doing it in an insensitive way? perhaps. But it is absolutely hyperbole.

    And hyperbole is a rhetorical device, so my original statement was factually correct.

  20. #100
    Performing the voice of a slave is certainly rhetorical but it isn't hyperbole or auxesis.

    It's also something you see a lot alongside other examples of racism or anti-semitism on 4 or 8chan

    See: "we wuz kangs" (or "kangz n shiet") another racist caricature of patois
    semi-aquatic like otters be.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •